Give me a 90/20 with 100bb over a 300bb reg who isn't great with that stack any day. Lol zoom
I don't think anyone is saying this or would disagree with
anyway continuing this discussion on how big an edge you gain when against a deepfish is an exercise in futility. So lets just say you think its a big gain, I think its not that big.
Sorry for probably some obvious questions, just got back into playing poker for few months (teacher holidays YAY!).
Is zoom more popular among 2+2ers these days? Is it purely hands per hour, how much higher is the volume?
What is the state of the games like these days (interested for 100nl really, played roughly around 600k hands a year or so ago)? I've been playing mostly 50nl and even there it doesn't seem great, lot of regs (all terrible but still..) and not as many fish.
Is there much likelihood of the american market opening again?
Disagree, nitting up when deep is a huge mistake and can be very exploitable. People adjusting either too loose or too tight is good news for a deep player whether you're referring to them just nitting up pre or post flop or both.
Never said it wasn't exploitable. I was just disagreeing that meh regs will make big mistakes for large amounts of bb's that often.
i would be surprised if edges werent higher 4 tabling zoom vs 12-14 tbling regular tables for the better regs, although i could be completely off
Lower edges but you can play more hands?
I cannot really 12-14 table but can play 4 tables of Zoom extremely easily, and therefore playing Zoom is more profitable for me...I think.
I've only started playing a month ago and so far have played 38k hands which I definitely would have not been able to do multi-tabling standard games. I'm winning at ev 6.36bb/100 over that sample. What winrates are achievable long-term at Zoom?
Two Plus Two
T
3
(2 players)
Linear Mode
