Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > No Limit Hold'em > Small Stakes PL/NL

Notices

Small Stakes PL/NL Discussions regarding small stakes pot and no-limit hold'em (50c-1 to 1-2)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2012, 01:22 PM   #51
centurion
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Israel
Posts: 139
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

hu4lolz is the best 100nl reg imo
mysto20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 01:51 PM   #52
Pooh-Bah
 
StimAbuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Panic Wrestling
Posts: 5,721
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAW_FORCE View Post
Word, thats a shame. On UB they payed out the limit per table you played. I remember 12 tabling nl200 there and got like 4k just for it hitting my limit and the BBJ was pretty small in comparison to this.

Been playing max tables at nl100 here hoping for it to bink the limit/table
StimAbuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 04:12 PM   #53
veteran
 
twoblacknines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lonesome Crowded West
Posts: 2,088
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by (._X)0---(^_^) View Post
having just move for a week or 2 to merge for the bbj i would say that this is a crazy statement. I have seen 2 solid tags and the rest are uber nits or weak-semitight regs.. few clueless lags and the easiest shortstackers to play in the world

Merge is probably the softest non italian site around, any decent 25nl reg on any other site could beat 100nl without table selecting
This is the crazy statement. I think you need to man up and post your screen name if you are going to throw statements like this around.

And the games are obviously softer because of the BBJ being so high.
twoblacknines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 05:30 PM   #54
Pooh-Bah
 
RAW_FORCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: I WANT TO STAKE YOU
Posts: 5,321
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

I agree that is a completely misinformed classification of the games on Merge
RAW_FORCE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 11:41 PM   #55
banned
 
(._X)0---(^_^)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monaco
Posts: 656
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by twoblacknines View Post
This is the crazy statement. I think you need to man up and post your screen name if you are going to throw statements like this around.

And the games are obviously softer because of the BBJ being so high.
im pretty much only playing regs which i had never done on any other site because they were far better. 100nl on merge is ubermicrostakes in terms of skills level.
(._X)0---(^_^) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 12:10 AM   #56
adept
 
olinolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 981
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by (._X)0---(^_^) View Post
im pretty much only playing regs which i had never done on any other site because they were far better. 100nl on merge is ubermicrostakes in terms of skills level.
I'd venture to say you're running well.
olinolin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 01:00 AM   #57
Pooh-Bah
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,430
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by (._X)0---(^_^) View Post
im pretty much only playing regs which i had never done on any other site because they were far better. 100nl on merge is ubermicrostakes in terms of skills level.
usually i just troll most stuff i read, but you are obviously a boss....lets 4-6 table whatever stake bhrahh?
shipit2kg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 01:03 AM   #58
veteran
 
DjSkyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: No longer, strictly speaking, busto
Posts: 2,734
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by twoblacknines View Post
This is the crazy statement. I think you need to man up and post your screen name if you are going to throw statements like this around.

And the games are obviously softer because of the BBJ being so high.
+1

this is ridiculous. i've been playing online poker since before anyone ever heard of chris moneymaker, and these are probably the toughest ssnl games i've ever played in.
DjSkyy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 03:08 AM   #59
banned
 
(._X)0---(^_^)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monaco
Posts: 656
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

so you played during the party boom and still cant afford to play higher than SSNL? How does that make you an expert on the thoughness of the games?

Get your database of 100nl and show me more than 10regs with higher WWSF than 42. I doubt you'll be able to do this at 100nl. Go on ipoker/ongame/party. Most regs have 3bets of 10% and WWSF of 47-55. Much much harder to play than 85% fit or fold players and 2-3 lags and 2-3 solid nits

I have not seen anyone decent outside of this partyb00m guy and he's still very spewy for a massive nit. entrncd would be the other decent reg.. thats about it..

All the quixstax/bigsh0tb0b type players are worth way more than fish. You can read their hands perfectly and they'll dump you buyins after buyins even if they run super hot and hit every 20% in allins they still manage to give it all away slowly.

Omgbadonkbadonk is my new favorite after today 32/27 with 36 WWSF and 1million % fold to 3bet

Btw i used to play 200 and 400 on merge last year and decided to quit after a 50k hand run bad. I was a 2.7ptbb winners in those games after the downswing playing every table i could and i glanced over my old database and found out quitting that site was clearly retarded, i was crushing even while runnning bad and very few regs were good.. so many sweatypig with regstats and -10bb/100 winrates. Other sites you get eaten by the rake even while bumhunting unless you run hot. Rake is very low on merge.

im sure 3/6 and 5/10 has some world class players but there still surrounded by 70% of spazz while on ongame/party/stars you have 94% world class regs 5% spazzy and a few fish that randomly pop

again i will refer to luckychewy's leggo videos. I coach a guy at 30nl on ongame and he table selects and has never seen a table as soft as those midstakes tables. Ongame's semi-fish playing 40/30 are only losing at -3bb/100.. better winrates than lots of merge regs
(._X)0---(^_^) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 03:58 AM   #60
centurion
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 179
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by (._X)0---(^_^) View Post
sry brah but you dont start tables.. in fact you pretty much just sit there and do nothing at the 6max


honestly i dont see the point of whining about regs sitting to your left. That means they let you have the fish to your right most of the time. I would be thankful if people sat to my left every single time.
1k hands...you have me completely figured out because those are very close to my long run stats congrats.

And yes I do start tables sometimes and yes I think its proper etiquette to sit across from the table
MmachineD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 04:26 AM   #61
banned
 
newschool2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Not important: Text wall response
Posts: 5,293
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

The merge games have alot of really nitty regulars, which is pretty lame. Its very boring/annoying to play them.
newschool2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 04:32 AM   #62
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
sharkbaitOHH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: woof
Posts: 7,128
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

move up to where you respect their game imo

@punching guy, games might be softer because I played with quickstax at 25NL when I first deposited and he didn't get anywhere last time I checked

oh and high wwsf =/= good player

Last edited by sharkbaitOHH; 01-08-2012 at 04:42 AM.
sharkbaitOHH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 07:25 AM   #63
veteran
 
nikinblinds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,443
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by (._X)0---(^_^) View Post
so you played during the party boom and still cant afford to play higher than SSNL? How does that make you an expert on the thoughness of the games?

Get your database of 100nl and show me more than 10regs with higher WWSF than 42. I doubt you'll be able to do this at 100nl. Go on ipoker/ongame/party. Most regs have 3bets of 10% and WWSF of 47-55. Much much harder to play than 85% fit or fold players and 2-3 lags and 2-3 solid nits

I have not seen anyone decent outside of this partyb00m guy and he's still very spewy for a massive nit. entrncd would be the other decent reg.. thats about it..

All the quixstax/bigsh0tb0b type players are worth way more than fish. You can read their hands perfectly and they'll dump you buyins after buyins even if they run super hot and hit every 20% in allins they still manage to give it all away slowly.

Omgbadonkbadonk is my new favorite after today 32/27 with 36 WWSF and 1million % fold to 3bet

Btw i used to play 200 and 400 on merge last year and decided to quit after a 50k hand run bad. I was a 2.7ptbb winners in those games after the downswing playing every table i could and i glanced over my old database and found out quitting that site was clearly retarded, i was crushing even while runnning bad and very few regs were good.. so many sweatypig with regstats and -10bb/100 winrates. Other sites you get eaten by the rake even while bumhunting unless you run hot. Rake is very low on merge.

im sure 3/6 and 5/10 has some world class players but there still surrounded by 70% of spazz while on ongame/party/stars you have 94% world class regs 5% spazzy and a few fish that randomly pop

again i will refer to luckychewy's leggo videos. I coach a guy at 30nl on ongame and he table selects and has never seen a table as soft as those midstakes tables. Ongame's semi-fish playing 40/30 are only losing at -3bb/100.. better winrates than lots of merge regs
why? guy hasnt beaten msnl for a few years.

70% spaz @ msnl on merge, lmfao. you might get 1 fish per table on a friday/sat night for 3-4 hours. rest of the time its hunt ua6 and hope diana pays a visit before your eyes bleed from spanish rat fks and nitregs.
nikinblinds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 10:19 AM   #64
adept
 
druidfluid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 866
Quote:
Originally Posted by (._X)0---(^_^) View Post
having just move for a week or 2 to merge for the bbj i would say that this is a crazy statement. I have seen 2 solid tags and the rest are uber nits or weak-semitight regs.. few clueless lags and the easiest shortstackers to play in the world

Merge is probably the softest non italian site around, any decent 25nl reg on any other site could beat 100nl without table selecting

Just watch the play in luckychewy's videos at 400 and 600/1k.. Feels like 30nl tables from ongame.
Funny. In the one I saw he specifically talked about the games being bad.
druidfluid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 05:18 PM   #65
Pooh-Bah
 
peterpjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,802
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschool View Post
The merge games have alot of really nitty regulars, which is pretty lame. Its very boring/annoying to play them.
That's why I play 41/37 or whatever I do.
peterpjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 11:39 PM   #66
banned
 
(._X)0---(^_^)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monaco
Posts: 656
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

so you are entrncd
(._X)0---(^_^) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 01:59 AM   #67
banned
 
newschool2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Not important: Text wall response
Posts: 5,293
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterpjames View Post
That's why I play 41/37 or whatever I do.
nit! lol
newschool2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 03:14 AM   #68
Pooh-Bah
 
peterpjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,802
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by (._X)0---(^_^) View Post
so you are entrncd
Nah, don't know who that is.

I'm going to try and tighten up into the 30's for VPIP though.
peterpjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 04:13 AM   #69
jdb
journeyman
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: It's poop again.
Posts: 284
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterpjames View Post
That's why I play 41/37 or whatever I do.
+1
jdb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 12:04 PM   #70
Pooh-Bah
 
DoubleFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Still Bloggin, Stakin, & Affiliatin
Posts: 5,987
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

wow. nit-regs giving a new guy credit. imagine that. report back in the summer.
DoubleFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 04:26 PM   #71
Pooh-Bah
 
peterpjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,802
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Can somebody tell me approx a ballpark figure for how much rakeback you would earn with standard Merge RB deal per 1000 hands of $100NL 6max? How much different is 200NL?

Would check my database but can't today, thanks!
peterpjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 05:15 PM   #72
veteran
 
twoblacknines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lonesome Crowded West
Posts: 2,088
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterpjames View Post
Can somebody tell me approx a ballpark figure for how much rakeback you would earn with standard Merge RB deal per 1000 hands of $100NL 6max? How much different is 200NL?

Would check my database but can't today, thanks!
I just posted this in the fr forum but it might help with your numbers. Plus it shows how sick the BBJ rake is. For 2012, I have played ~20,000 hands, all 100nl mainly 6 max, and all BBJ tables. PT3 shows me at $1939 in rake.

However, when I check my stats on lock, it shows me as only paying ~$1200 in rake. The difference is from the BBJ rake, which you don't get any back of. So after 20k hands I've paid 7 buyins at 100nl directly to BBJ. So sick.
twoblacknines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 06:56 PM   #73
old hand
 
The Caca Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: You're either a pro or a noob.
Posts: 1,769
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

yeah, but if you hit that fkker one timmmmmmme
The Caca Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 07:39 PM   #74
Pooh-Bah
 
peterpjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,802
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Brutal! And I forgot it's contributed rake so it varies person to person.
peterpjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 08:02 PM   #75
veteran
 
DjSkyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: No longer, strictly speaking, busto
Posts: 2,734
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

man what a bunch of trolling itt. nice community.

between all the regs hating on each other and the spanish ****tards, makes me feel like i was really missing out before black froday.
DjSkyy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 08:33 PM   #76
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Malefiicus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ribonucleic acid freak out.
Posts: 6,411
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

My boomboom sense is tingling.
Malefiicus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 09:52 PM   #77
centurion
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 179
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by twoblacknines View Post
I just posted this in the fr forum but it might help with your numbers. Plus it shows how sick the BBJ rake is. For 2012, I have played ~20,000 hands, all 100nl mainly 6 max, and all BBJ tables. PT3 shows me at $1939 in rake.

However, when I check my stats on lock, it shows me as only paying ~$1200 in rake. The difference is from the BBJ rake, which you don't get any back of. So after 20k hands I've paid 7 buyins at 100nl directly to BBJ. So sick.
Pretty sickening numbers. I'm thinking all the fish swarming for the bad beat make up for this loss to rake with how bad they play. if not then we're all losing money haha
MmachineD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 05:18 PM   #78
veteran
 
ilikeaces86_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,568
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Well not really b/c theoretically the majority of the money (minus the house take) comes back to the players. Now there is huge variance in whether or not you will ever see any of that money but the players get back a chunk of it so its not the same as flushing it down the toilet like regular rake (minus rakeback).
ilikeaces86_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 05:47 PM   #79
Pooh-Bah
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,430
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

****ing god damn, im disconnecting every ****ing 30 seconds...losing tons. auskdhlgljkg ;adgslkj ****kkkkkkk this stupid **** fuuuuuuuuuuuuu merge asdkjasdgasldkujg adshglkjSDFkjldsdfljkhasdflkj
shipit2kg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 06:24 PM   #80
veteran
 
NimhOfJoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bluffing for value
Posts: 2,487
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by twoblacknines View Post
I just posted this in the fr forum but it might help with your numbers. Plus it shows how sick the BBJ rake is. For 2012, I have played ~20,000 hands, all 100nl mainly 6 max, and all BBJ tables. PT3 shows me at $1939 in rake.

However, when I check my stats on lock, it shows me as only paying ~$1200 in rake. The difference is from the BBJ rake, which you don't get any back of. So after 20k hands I've paid 7 buyins at 100nl directly to BBJ. So sick.
This might not be entirely accurate - as far as I've noticed, the rake you pay as calculated by Merge is smaller than the number posted by PT3. I don't know how either of them actually calculate "rake" (or MGR, the other PT3 stat), but I know it doesn't line up with Merge's number.
NimhOfJoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 06:42 PM   #81
enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Not folding
Posts: 87
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

deposited $100 to rebuild BR quickly and found nitty NL10 games lol ... some time ago I played NL100+ here and games were much softer than this Nl10 games I guess.
M. Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 08:11 PM   #82
veteran
 
twoblacknines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lonesome Crowded West
Posts: 2,088
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by NimhOfJoy View Post
This might not be entirely accurate - as far as I've noticed, the rake you pay as calculated by Merge is smaller than the number posted by PT3. I don't know how either of them actually calculate "rake" (or MGR, the other PT3 stat), but I know it doesn't line up with Merge's number.
When I was playing only nl50 tables my pt3 numbers would match up really closely to my merge numbers though.
twoblacknines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 10:40 PM   #83
Pooh-Bah
 
StimAbuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Panic Wrestling
Posts: 5,721
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Got it in with KQHH vs JJ on ThJh4s and turned the royal on a BBJ table.


My heart was broken when the river was a Q. I may never recover.
StimAbuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 11:22 PM   #84
Pooh-Bah
 
StimAbuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Panic Wrestling
Posts: 5,721
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Probably going to be on monkey tilt the next week or so
StimAbuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 12:29 AM   #85
grinder
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 483
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

We had another hand where we had TTTT vs AAA the other day on the turn, so also 1 out away from the BBJ.
Stefan Prodan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 01:03 AM   #86
veteran
 
twoblacknines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lonesome Crowded West
Posts: 2,088
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

alright which one of you spew monkeys is iambadhouseplayer?
twoblacknines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 02:12 AM   #87
banned
 
(._X)0---(^_^)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monaco
Posts: 656
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

ivan
(._X)0---(^_^) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 09:12 PM   #88
adept
 
joshuadalton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: like my chips?
Posts: 1,122
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

hello? hello? is this thing on?
joshuadalton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 09:34 PM   #89
banned
 
imagin.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 117
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Who are the best 100nl'ers you think?
imagin. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 10:42 PM   #90
Pooh-Bah
 
SirFelixCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 5,150
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malefiicus View Post
My boomboom sense is tingling.
So spot on it's sick.
SirFelixCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 11:49 AM   #91
journeyman
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 381
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

gl for 2012 guys
MomWasRight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 07:12 PM   #92
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 75
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Which luckbox hit the BBJ?
WrongPrice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 07:25 PM   #93
Pooh-Bah
 
RAW_FORCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: I WANT TO STAKE YOU
Posts: 5,321
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

bbj was hit at 1/2 Limit
RAW_FORCE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 08:17 PM   #94
Pooh-Bah
 
StimAbuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Panic Wrestling
Posts: 5,721
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Good, now I can stop playing whenever I'm home and don't feel like playing and mass tabling anyways.
StimAbuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 10:13 PM   #95
adept
 
joshuadalton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: like my chips?
Posts: 1,122
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

What was the split/payout?
joshuadalton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2012, 01:00 AM   #96
adept
 
baker2g's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,176
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Quote:
Originally Posted by StimAbuser View Post
Good, now I can stop playing whenever I'm home and don't feel like playing and mass tabling anyways.
lol +1
baker2g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2012, 03:22 PM   #97
Pooh-Bah
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,430
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

Highgrindtime is most certainly a bot
shipit2kg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2012, 08:20 PM   #98
adept
 
biendover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 803
Re: ***THE OFFICIAL 2012 MERGE REGULARS THREAD***

anyone ever order an ipad from the gift shop and whats the turnaround time?
biendover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2012, 10:46 PM   #99
old hand
 
sevendeuc24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: paper chasin'
Posts: 1,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by shipit2kg View Post
Highgrindtime is most certainly a bot
i don't think so, he's very very bad thoughand has bluff raised me in retarted spots
sevendeuc24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2012, 10:59 PM   #100
old hand
 
conquistador28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Penn State football camp
Posts: 1,304
Not not. Know who it is. Former ftp crusher actually
conquistador28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive
 
 
Poker Players - Streaming Live Online