Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Went to showdown% Went to showdown%

01-21-2008 , 02:42 PM
What is considered a normal wtsd%, and what high and what low?

What % should we be aiming for and why. And how much does it depend on style.

Also, how do vpip and wtsd relate?
01-21-2008 , 02:48 PM
yeah I always wondered this myself. 28+ is considered a calling station. 25 I thought was on the high end of the spectrum for regs and 20 is considered low.
01-21-2008 , 03:00 PM
higher vpip means lower wtsd bc youre seeing the flop with much more marginal hands and therefore will not go to showdown as much.

mine is 23 fwiw and i play about 28/22
01-21-2008 , 03:06 PM
Mine is 21 and I play 19.5/17. I feel like mine is lower than it should be though. On the other hand, my W$WSF is 44.
01-21-2008 , 03:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotbacon
higher vpip means lower wtsd bc youre seeing the flop with much more marginal hands and therefore will not go to showdown as much.

mine is 23 fwiw and i play about 28/22
Out of curiosity, what is your W$SD and your river af?

I ask because I'm playing around 25/22 right now, but my WTSD is around 26 I believe (not near stats atm).
01-21-2008 , 03:19 PM
W$SD mostly depends on how i'm running but it is usually around 48ish or so. my riv af is 5 i believe
01-21-2008 , 03:21 PM
At 200nl I'm having 26% wtsd playing 26/22. I don't think I'm a station and I think could find more spots to go to sd.
01-21-2008 , 03:21 PM
mine is 25 playing 24/21. 50% w$wsf
01-21-2008 , 03:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotbacon
W$SD mostly depends on how i'm running but it is usually around 48ish or so. my riv af is 5 i believe
Ok thanks. I'm looking for leaks, I think I may show down too many losers. Our preflop stats are similar so I wanted a comparison.
01-21-2008 , 03:23 PM
20-26% is fine. I have found that aggression has a lot to do with it as well in that excessive aggression can lower wtsd and w$sd.
01-21-2008 , 03:25 PM
20% wtsd playing 24/18. Too low?
01-21-2008 , 03:26 PM
Mine is 24-25 at 22/19 and I consider myself kindof a station.
Looking at it isolated is pretty useless imo as it depends so much on personal style. In connection with W$SD it could tell you wether you vbet thinly enough.

My W$SD is 48 and I think I vbet slightly too thin.
01-21-2008 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Royale
At 200nl I'm having 26% wtsd playing 26/22. I don't think I'm a station and I think could find more spots to go to sd.
I dont play the same stats, but wtsd percentage is the same. And my thoughts are the same concering showdown.
01-21-2008 , 03:30 PM
I don't think these really matter that much but meh.

WTSD is 21.38 playing 20.16/17.19/5.16, with a W$WSF at 44.01 and a W$SD at 50.24 over my last sample
01-21-2008 , 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotbacon
W$SD mostly depends on how i'm running but it is usually around 48ish or so. my riv af is 5 i believe
5 is a pretty sickly high river af am I right?
01-21-2008 , 03:34 PM
Yeah, 5 is a crazy af for river. Mine is 2.5-3 and I'm more aggro than most.
01-21-2008 , 03:36 PM
I'm struggling to get up to 2 af on the river...
01-21-2008 , 03:37 PM
5 is superuser territory
01-21-2008 , 03:39 PM
My river AF is 2.5 and I feel like I'm pretty aggressive there too. Can't imagine being twice as aggressive. Are you just value towning everything? Bluffing every time you don't have great showdown value?
01-21-2008 , 03:42 PM
18/14

22 wtsd%
01-21-2008 , 03:44 PM
I would guess a high wwsf could result in lower wtsd. Thoughts? Edit: Pretty much what K Nicholas said.

Mine wwsf is 45% and my wtsd is 26%. Both pretty high numbers, even though my wwsf could be a bit higher I guess.
01-21-2008 , 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kairos
Mine is 24-25 at 22/19 and I consider myself kindof a station.
Looking at it isolated is pretty useless imo as it depends so much on personal style. In connection with W$SD it could tell you wether you vbet thinly enough.

My W$SD is 48 and I think I vbet slightly too thin.
I don't you'll get to know alot about if you're v-betting thin enoughby comparing wtsd and w$sd. It tells you more about if you're folding too many winners (ie not call down light enough). But a low w$sd could probably be a sign of a bluffy/aggressive player if it's combined with a high wwsf.
01-21-2008 , 04:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Royale
I would guess a high wwsf could result in lower wtsd. Thoughts? Edit: Pretty much what K Nicholas said.

Mine wwsf is 45% and my wtsd is 26%. Both pretty high numbers, even though my wwsf could be a bit higher I guess.
They rise together in my experience. When i played super crazy at 5/10 i had a 52% wwsf with a 30% wtsd. I am pretty sure fabian has posted similar stats somewhere. maybe try to find a screenshot of kotkis' PT
01-21-2008 , 04:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyser.
My river AF is 2.5 and I feel like I'm pretty aggressive there too. Can't imagine being twice as aggressive. Are you just value towning everything? Bluffing every time you don't have great showdown value?
just checked pt and it looks like i lied, it's actually 4.

i think it's a combo of me being very aggro and not paying off enough no the river? i dunno, i sorta changed styles this month and my riv af went from just above 2 to 4. i guess it's mostly cuz i'm bluffing more
01-21-2008 , 04:03 PM
46 WWSF, 27 WTSD. Only a 2 river AF though .

      
m