Had long discussion if this hand plays better as c/c or cbet (2-3 barrl blanks) against unknown reg.

Pro CBet:

UTG range has equity advantage and should bet quite a lot
Fold out Qx JJ TT hands by the river
9x is to weak to play for SD on this board
We can ship vs raise

Pro C/C:

SD value + draw
Protect our Kx QJ QT c/c hands on flush cards a little bit
He has lots of low pp which have <10%
We already have a lot of AT AJ cbet bluff hands

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $1(BB) Replayer
BB ($99)
($100)
UTG ($89.17)
Hero ($125)
UTG+2 ($97.64)
MP1 ($106)
MP2 ($107)
CO ($98.50)

BB posts (SB) $0.50

Dealt to Hero T 9

fold, Hero raises to $3, fold, fold, MP2 calls $3, fold, fold, fold

FLOP ($7.50) K 9 Q

Hero checks, MP2 bets $5.62, Hero calls $5.62

TURN ($18.74) K 9 Q 7

Hero checks, MP2 bets $14.05, Hero calls $14.05

RIVER ($46.84) K 9 Q 7 Q

Hero checks, MP2 bets $35.13, Hero folds

MP2 wins $45.66

I c/c here pretty often, but I'm also torn which is the better line.

X/c is far better as we don't really have equity to get it in over a flop raise and folding at any point sucks ass.

By check calling we ensure we get to see a turn and river 99% of the time and it's nice to have some flush combos on those runouts so we can't get barrelled off on on club runouts with impunity.

i like c/c as well for reasons already mentioned