Quote:
Originally Posted by shpanko
I think this is poor phrasing tbh. I don't think one can "overestimate" the amount of skill involved in poker but rather only underestimate the blunting/exaggerating effect of luck. The higher ones edge/ true winrate (though this is probably fairly unknowable) the less likely one is to have massive downswings or massive long BE stretches.
That said, we will all eventually go through one or more massive stretch of negative variance. I had what basically amounted to a 200k hand, 5-6 month BE stretch last year. Like shipit says, it alters your perception of people's ranges and skews one's usually good instincts to seeing monsters under the bed constantly and being too timid. It's incredibly tough to get through those stretches. I myself had to drop down to 100 nl and even 50nl for about a month for the first time in over 6 years. Once you win 5+ BI's and start to play well again by playing a lower variance game at lower stakes things slowly turn around though and eventually your game will get back to where it once was. Gl shipit, always thought you were a great player and I hope you persevere through this.
Kinda nitty, but I can agree with the phrasing comment to some extent.
I'd add that when you're in the midst of a terrible downswing, sometimes it makes sense to STOP talking strat with your group of friends, and focus on only one player who you "know" is solid. I know when I was in that spot, it was frustrating beyond belief to discuss a hand with multiple people and get multiple answers saying that I was both wrong and right. While they may well have both been right and it came down to me providing appropriate reads, it did more to make me feel unlucky and confused than to help sort the problem.
I guess the flip side of that were the hands where I was SURE my play was right, and multiple good players would tell me I was wrong for the same reason.
Still, 99% of life is luck, starting with what vagina you came out of, and poker is no different. FACT