Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilillan
I'm genuinely curious, does it bother you that I'm a U.S citizen but never have and never will vote?
I'm happy to have kicked off a discussion on politics (we had religion a few weeks ago, after all), at least until it gets tiresome. I've not been particularly politically minded until recently (the Republican candidate selection process really kicked things off for me, in fact I would nominate Rick Santorum as being the guy that scared me into action).
As for your question, there is a difference between being born in the US and becoming a naturalized citizen, and I would be more concerned about someone that went through the time and expense of immigration and still didn't vote.
Having said that, while I totally understand the futility of the individual's vote, it saddens me that >40% of the eligible population didn't bother to vote in 2008. If you can look at the reason why you don't vote, for example, you might solve the problem of why all your peers don't vote, and then you are getting meaningful change. But, I was just reading a snippet from wiki about voter turnout and game theory,
Reasons For Voting:
"
In any large election the chance of any one vote determining the outcome is low. Some studies show that a single vote in a voting scheme such as the Electoral College in the United States has an even lower chance of determining the outcome. Other studies claim that the Electoral College actually increases voting power. Studies using game theory, which takes into account the ability of voters to interact, have also found that the expected turnout for any large election should be zero."
Getting involved at the local level and with specific policies that are important to you (e.g. legalizing poker) are going to be more effective strategies - and "getting involved" means more than simply voting: campaigning and writing letters, making donations, can all be effective.
At the national level, its harder to see why you should bother*, but I still think you should, simply given the unique history of the United States, and the embarrassing turnout % currently. Being too busy is a lame excuse, it does not take a meaningful amount of your time once every four years. (being apathetic about the candidates is a better excuse imo). I know there is some inconsistency in this view, but I think even a miniscule impact resulting from acting on your civic duty is still meaningful on other levels, in comparison to sitting on your ass.
* biggest reasons: i) electoral college can make your vote in a majority region completely futile, ii) campaign donations from big business dwarfs anything from individuals, and this is a really big concern. Also iii), the impact of having one president over another is not really that great, the president can't do much on his own (veto's being one particularly powerful option).