Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > No Limit Hold'em > Small Stakes PL/NL

Notices

Small Stakes PL/NL Discussions regarding small stakes pot and no-limit hold'em (50c-1 to 1-2)

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-21-2012, 10:56 PM   #16
Carnal \ 'Knowledge
 
terp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: @terppoker
Posts: 14,527
Re: BB defense HU

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirwanda View Post
Unlike the real regfish (like Combat Carl and most likely yourself) I actually beat the games and has been living off them for years.
with all your free time folding powerhouse jack rag offsuits in the BB, you might look up how to use reflexive pronouns
terp is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 12:37 AM   #17
veteran
 
CombatCarl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Somewhere in Asia
Posts: 3,351
Re: BB defense HU

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirwanda View Post
Yeah, I'm totally made. ^^

So I made a quick post last night when I was tired which came out a little wrong. I tried to explain that with my last post btw.

All this still doesn't change the fact that you're a microdonk posting about roulette though.

So I would be careful tossing the regfish label around. Turns out it bit your right back in the a*s this time, as I am winning in the midstakes while you're apparently struggling in stakes 10x less than what I play.

Not going to be posting any more ITT btw, making a nice little hit'n run here I think. It's going to de-rail (already has) and the thread wasn't really that interesting to begin with.
"Yeah, I'm totally made. ^^ " -

"a little wrong" - LOL

"I am winning in the midstakes while you're apparently struggling in stakes 10x less than what I play." - 10x? That's 1000NL. You just moved from 200NL to 400NL. Why are you playing 100NL again if you are so successful?

"Not going to be posting any more ITT btw" - That's a good decision. You'll just look dumber and dumber trying to defend yourself.

Conclusion - A Fish Called Nirwanda

The reason - I just imagine him stuttering as he tries to prove himself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrcDNKwWszA
CombatCarl is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 01:35 PM   #18
centurion
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 180
Re: BB defense HU

Bookmark this thread guys. TheRick is currently busy playing microstakes and roulette but he'll make time for a regfish called Wanda soon.
TheRick is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 02:27 PM   #19
veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Seattle,WA/Las Vegas,NV
Posts: 2,364
Re: BB defense HU

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirwanda View Post
HU? 6max? Either way, flatting J6o is bad against everyone, even if they minopen 100% from SB
you are still living in 2006...
BEAR JEW is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 03:04 PM   #20
veteran
 
amurophil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: TAIPEI
Posts: 3,499
Re: BB defense HU

meh to be fair thats more like 2008/2009 thinking
amurophil is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 06:29 PM   #21
journeyman
 
votemau5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 274
lol
Some solid discussion itt
votemau5 is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 12:10 PM   #22
veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Seattle,WA/Las Vegas,NV
Posts: 2,364
Re: BB defense HU

Quote:
Originally Posted by amurophil View Post
meh to be fair thats more like 2008/2009 thinking
sounds about right. i thought like this around then lol
BEAR JEW is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 12:18 PM   #23
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
clowntable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 39, 46, 56, 59, 191
Posts: 39,774
Re: BB defense HU

Grunchlstein...I assume we're talking about a minopen from SB and we are BB.
J6 is a nobrainer snapdefend for me unless I 3bet it which I usually won't.
clowntable is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 12:42 PM   #24
veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Seattle,WA/Las Vegas,NV
Posts: 2,364
Re: BB defense HU

Quote:
Originally Posted by clowntable View Post
Grunchlstein...I assume we're talking about a minopen from SB and we are BB.
J6 is a nobrainer snapdefend for me unless I 3bet it which I usually won't.
im talking about min raise vs the btn
BEAR JEW is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 11:11 PM   #25
newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: 4bet bluffing russians
Posts: 36
Re: BB defense HU

Quote:
Originally Posted by CombatCarl View Post
"Yeah, I'm totally made. ^^ " -

"a little wrong" - LOL

"I am winning in the midstakes while you're apparently struggling in stakes 10x less than what I play." - 10x? That's 1000NL. You just moved from 200NL to 400NL. Why are you playing 100NL again if you are so successful?

"Not going to be posting any more ITT btw" - That's a good decision. You'll just look dumber and dumber trying to defend yourself.

Conclusion - A Fish Called Nirwanda

The reason - I just imagine him stuttering as he tries to prove himself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrcDNKwWszA
Lol you two (Carl and Rick)are so retarded . Can't you use your semi-functioning brains to understand that everything Nirwanda posts makes a lot of sense and confirms that he's one of the few solid winners that spend time writing in this forum filled by regfish. (and he can back up his talk with results, I'm convinced you can't?! Mr. I bombard the midstakes section with clueless posts and then realize ur a fish and move down to embarrass the SSNL section)

I don't know any of you and therefore am socially bound to not enter the argument , but it really pisses me off when someone as talented and as dedicated to posting great stuff all the time gets attacked by the biggest regfish in town.

I'm not trying to "defend" Nirwanda, since a winning player at the limits he plays surely won't fall to the level of stupidity of losing players and listen to their **** wisdom, I'm just really surprised that one backs up the thinking, helpful players when their posts gets attacked. Plz Nirwanda and the other good posters keep up the good work and don't bother replying to people who are down money at online poker! you help thousands of lurkers like me step up their game by providing your thoughts on hands!

ps its not in my habits to target the mentally challenged folks, but ffs leave the good guys alone lol, wtfs wrong with ya
i <3 checkfolding is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 11:39 PM   #26
banned
 
Back off Kiddo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,346
Re: BB defense HU

Spoiler:
Back off Kiddo is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 11:42 PM   #27
veteran
 
CombatCarl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Somewhere in Asia
Posts: 3,351
Re: BB defense HU

Quote:
Originally Posted by i <3 checkfolding View Post
Lol you two (Carl and Rick)are so retarded . Can't you use your semi-functioning brains to understand that everything Nirwanda posts makes a lot of sense and confirms that he's one of the few solid winners that spend time writing in this forum filled by regfish. (and he can back up his talk with results, I'm convinced you can't?! Mr. I bombard the midstakes section with clueless posts and then realize ur a fish and move down to embarrass the SSNL section)

I don't know any of you and therefore am socially bound to not enter the argument , but it really pisses me off when someone as talented and as dedicated to posting great stuff all the time gets attacked by the biggest regfish in town.

I'm not trying to "defend" Nirwanda, since a winning player at the limits he plays surely won't fall to the level of stupidity of losing players and listen to their **** wisdom, I'm just really surprised that one backs up the thinking, helpful players when their posts gets attacked. Plz Nirwanda and the other good posters keep up the good work and don't bother replying to people who are down money at online poker! you help thousands of lurkers like me step up their game by providing your thoughts on hands!

ps its not in my habits to target the mentally challenged folks, but ffs leave the good guys alone lol, wtfs wrong with ya
And something like that of fish scales fell from my eyes and now I could see.

Thank you for opening my eyes sir. I did not know what or who I was talking about. Therefore, I repent in ashes and I admit that I was a fool for making such nonsensical comments. I'm truly sorry.

The least I can do is this,

Spoiler:


You have transformed my thinking into this,

Spoiler:


Or this,

Spoiler:


But more importantly this,

Spoiler:

If you are not defending Nirwanda then what exactly are you doing?
CombatCarl is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 11:56 PM   #28
veteran
 
CombatCarl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Somewhere in Asia
Posts: 3,351
Re: BB defense HU

Quote:
Originally Posted by Back off Kiddo View Post
Hey CombatCarl (14 year old nickname)

How about you shut your filthy diseased mouth you loathsome **********.

My dad happen to be a ****ing moose hunter, and he has a loaded ****ing gun in his storage room. Maybe... I'll make him shoot ya' you ****ing ****
Spoiler:

Spoiler:
Terp

Please ban this guy. He just made a actual death threat with picture and everything.

I spoke the truth and now I'm gonna die for it?

What am I a poker martyr?
CombatCarl is offline  
Old 06-24-2012, 11:57 PM   #29
newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: 4bet bluffing russians
Posts: 36
Re: BB defense HU

Carl have u binked a mid or high stakes tourney?
i <3 checkfolding is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 03:03 AM   #30
veteran
 
CombatCarl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Somewhere in Asia
Posts: 3,351
Re: BB defense HU

Quote:
Originally Posted by i <3 checkfolding View Post
Lol you two (Carl and Rick)are so retarded . Can't you use your semi-functioning brains to understand that everything Nirwanda posts makes a lot of sense and confirms that he's one of the few solid winners that spend time writing in this forum filled by regfish. (and he can back up his talk with results, I'm convinced you can't?! Mr. I bombard the midstakes section with clueless posts and then realize ur a fish and move down to embarrass the SSNL section)

I don't know any of you and therefore am socially bound to not enter the argument , but it really pisses me off when someone as talented and as dedicated to posting great stuff all the time gets attacked by the biggest regfish in town.

I'm not trying to "defend" Nirwanda, since a winning player at the limits he plays surely won't fall to the level of stupidity of losing players and listen to their **** wisdom, I'm just really surprised that one backs up the thinking, helpful players when their posts gets attacked. Plz Nirwanda and the other good posters keep up the good work and don't bother replying to people who are down money at online poker! you help thousands of lurkers like me step up their game by providing your thoughts on hands!

ps its not in my habits to target the mentally challenged folks, but ffs leave the good guys alone lol, wtfs wrong with ya
Terp

Can you please check the IP address of Nirwanda and i <3 checkfolding and cross reference them?

Some of the things he said above just makes me very suspicious.

Nirwanda stated in the thread that he would exclude himself from discussion while TheRick predicted that he would return. Nirwanda's comment continued to get criticized by some very good players after the fact.

Supposedly, i <3 checkfolding just joined recently but speaks of Nirwanda like he has been reading his comments for years. I also checked out their writing styles and find them oddly similar. If using multiple accounts in this manner is against the rule then I would like to suggest that you punish one entity that would be him or her or him/her(hermaphrodite/transvestite) accordingly. That wasn't a joke. I just wanna be thorough in this day and age.

"and he can back up his talk with results" - How does he know this?

I would like to apologize to Nirwanda and i <3 checkfolding in advance in case if I'm wrong but I think abusing the system in this manner should not be tolerated at TwoPlusTwo.com. No offense and this is nothing personal. I just wanna defend the integrity of the forum.
CombatCarl is offline  

Closed Thread
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive