Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > No Limit Hold'em > Small Stakes PL/NL

Notices

Small Stakes PL/NL Discussions regarding small stakes pot and no-limit hold'em (50c-1 to 1-2)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2008, 05:54 PM   #16
centurion
 
tbmunson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: GlasVegas
Posts: 168
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

I really don't love this given fish's stack size tbh.
tbmunson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 05:59 PM   #17
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Barewire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: grinding and blogging
Posts: 9,505
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oct0puz View Post
C-betting less is just bad here. Against a range of 44+,AQ,AK we have 26% equity so if we bet 1/2 pot we have to call a shove anyway. Just shove the flop to maxime your fold equity.
Im not using stove right now but I think our equity is f*ed when we consider the 3x and 7x hands he could have, as well as the naked overcards that still have us beat at roughly the same equity as the range you posted.
Barewire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 02:56 AM   #18
adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 840
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

130,680 games 0.016 secs 8,167,500 games/sec

Board: 7c 3h 7h
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 72.365% 71.88% 00.48% 93936 630.50 { 22+, AQs+, A7s, A3s, KhQh, KhJh, K7s, K3s, QhJh, 97s, 87s, 75s+, AQo+, A7o, A3o }
Hand 1: 27.635% 27.15% 00.48% 35483 630.50 { 6h5c }


---

130,680 games 0.005 secs 26,136,000 games/sec

Board: 7c 3h 7h
Dead:
Oct0puz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 03:31 AM   #19
Pooh-Bah
 
Sly Caveat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,295
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

You're just asking to be put in a spot where you have 6 high and no draw on the flop and a c-bet commits you. What do you do then? I'd want to have a showdown hand with SB being so loose with a short stack.

Edit- Okay I guess you wouldn't be completely committed to call a shove if you cbet, but still...
Sly Caveat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 03:55 AM   #20
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,247
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkE View Post
I wonder if you can profitably squeeze shorties: most of them will not fold. So no, I don't particularly like it. I do like squeezing with trash like 87s, 74s and the likes, but I'll usually choose a suited hand (gives you a few more % of equity postflop).
87s isn't trash and most of the time you shouldn't be squeezing with it. usually squeezing with offsuit trash is okay, but of course I prefer a Q4s compared to a Q4o.
jaysu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 04:34 AM   #21
old hand
 
primate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: robusto
Posts: 1,776
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

I dont like any of this, in fact its very bad.

I wouldnt be squeezing a fish with crap but rather 2 high face cards. We are called too often and will flop very little the vast majority of the time and be forced to run pure bluffs. not what we want against a fish. Also DONT squeeze shorties without the goods, we have no room for manouvre post flop.

post flop I give up. check/fold is best line. you got lucky, cbetting this flop is -EV. fishy villain will be calling with the vast majority of his range most of the time here.
primate is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive