Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > No Limit Hold'em > Small Stakes PL/NL

Small Stakes PL/NL Discussions regarding small stakes pot and no-limit hold'em (50c-1 to 1-2)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2008, 06:10 AM   #1
veteran
 
Rodolphe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,018
100NL - Squeeze very "light"

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $1(BB) Replayer
SB ($54.55)
Hero ($113)
UTG ($35)
UTG+1 ($124)
CO ($115)
BTN ($147)

Dealt to Hero 65

fold, fold, fold, BTN raises to $3, SB calls $2.50, Hero raises to $14, fold, SB calls $11,

FLOP ($31) 373

check, Hero bets $30, SB folds


I'm more interested about the preflop action than the flop but I let it if you have any comments.

BTN is TAG, steal a lot (40% from BTN) and folds a lot to 3bet (80%).
SB is a loose fish 49/9/3.5.

My hand is terrible BUT the spot is awesome. It looks like the dream squeeze spot to me (no ?). Does it justify to squeeze that light ?

If we're a bit result oriented, it's a bad squeeze since SB could be calling with a wide range. I don't think it's very bad because we have position, initiative, we rep a premium hand and we're gonna take down the pot so often because he'll play fit or fold.


Thoughts ?
Rodolphe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 06:40 AM   #2
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
dirtylobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,724
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

It's a good spot though I expect SB to call pre a reasonable amount of the time but also c/f most flops. nh

edit: SB's calling freqency prob. depends a lot on your image

Last edited by dirtylobster; 12-08-2008 at 06:45 AM.
dirtylobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 06:46 AM   #3
veteran
 
Kimpan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: meatballs and blonde babes
Posts: 2,830
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

That's a big flop cbet.. unnecessarily expensive bluff IMO
Kimpan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 06:48 AM   #4
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
dirtylobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,724
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

I was going to mention that but he wasn't interested in flop advice.
dirtylobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 07:03 AM   #5
veteran
 
Rodolphe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,018
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

Not exactly
Quote:
I'm more interested about the preflop action than the flop but I let it if you have any comments.

He is so short (he has 40$ left) on the flop, it was a bit awkward. I choose to bet big to show more strenght and sometimes make him fold 44-88 (possible ? idk). I'll call his shove (10 more dollars).

Maybe bet/fold 17-20 is better, Idk.
Rodolphe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 07:31 AM   #6
adept
 
MonkE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: implied threat
Posts: 711
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

I wonder if you can profitably squeeze shorties: most of them will not fold. So no, I don't particularly like it. I do like squeezing with trash like 87s, 74s and the likes, but I'll usually choose a suited hand (gives you a few more % of equity postflop).
MonkE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 07:47 AM   #7
journeyman
 
APD0290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 292
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodolphe View Post
we're gonna take down the pot so often because he'll play fit or fold.
Means you don't have to pot the flop, between 1/2 and 2/3 would be better
APD0290 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 07:50 AM   #8
adept
 
MonkE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: implied threat
Posts: 711
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

yes your bet is too large on the flop, I usually make it 1/2
MonkE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 08:33 AM   #9
veteran
 
Rodolphe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,018
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

ok, understood.
Rodolphe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 09:21 AM   #10
old hand
 
ZaneKinetic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grinding NL50, not spewing chips.
Posts: 1,207
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

The situation is okay, but I don't like the hand or SB stack.

If he 4bet shoves when it comes to him, you'll be getting almost 2-1 and god knows what that fishes range might be. It me much more willing to squeeze hands with high card value so a) we can call a shove and b) we can actually value bet the flop.
ZaneKinetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 09:41 AM   #11
journeyman
 
lag0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: winter wonderland
Posts: 357
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

sb is calling your squeeze almost every time so I'd rather have a bit better hand myself. If sb was a tag it would be better. I guess it's still fine if sb folds to cbets a lot.
lag0n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 10:00 AM   #12
journeyman
 
manoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 259
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

as a default squeeze from BB when btn raises and sb fish calls is ok. i dont like the fact he is short... anyways go for it, he will have to hit to counteract you
manoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 10:03 AM   #13
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
dirtylobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,724
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

Yeah I initially didn't see his stacksize.
dirtylobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 12:41 PM   #14
adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 722
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

C-betting less is just bad here. Against a range of 44+,AQ,AK we have 26% equity so if we bet 1/2 pot we have to call a shove anyway. Just shove the flop to maxime your fold equity.
Oct0puz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 05:36 PM   #15
old hand
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,961
Re: 100NL - Squeeze very "light"

I guess squeezing is alright, tho I would be a little worried about the SB being loose and having a medium stack. If you think he will call a lot you will get in a lot of tricky/bad spots postflop. I wouldn't do it, just because I am worried about SB calling, but it might be a good spot. I would like it quite a bit better if SB was deeper, so we could play some postflop with position if he does call. I would also bet less on the flop, since it will accomplishes pretty much the same.
mattiesmat is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2009, Two Plus Two Interactive
 
Message Boards and Forums Directory