Quote:
Originally Posted by Jever
That's an interesting analysis. And I haven't read it all tbh.
But why do you think Hero should have a x/c range? I don't disagree with you, but your x/c range seems a bit narrow IMO. IMO it should be wider.
From an exploitative standpoint, your range looks just fine. ATM. From an unexploitative standpoint... not so much.
|
Do you mean SB? Because BB should be able to turn some hands into bluffs, AJ is a whole 15combos here and probably prefers to bluff on this run out rather than showdown, as well as some 5x hands. Also, if SB has no c/c range, then BB can't vbet anything :S which makes no sense, and if that's the case, BB can just bet his entire range and win(unless of course SB goes for a c-r sometimes, which may be the case on a board like this idk).
You think SB should get to the river and c/f too much air to only c/c AA/KK/AQ? SB needs to c/c about 60%-70% of his checking range depending on BB's bet size, to be optimal but i have no idea on how much air SB has if he plays optimally. Qx/Tx are pretty much the same here i think as bluff catchers. If you c/c too much though BB can't bluff.
Lol, that's unfortunate, since i was going for the unexploitive..
Ty for help.
@G.Threepwood: Qx would be too thin for SB to vbet i think, though i could be wrong, and why incl QJ and not AQ?