Didn't play poker for quite some time. Giving PLO one final chance, starting at the very bottom

In the below hand I ran into a situation on the flop that always confuses me as I don't know how to take into account the implied odds on later streets.

When SB check-raises the flop I am quite sure that he has a set.
Pot odds are 33%, my odds are nearly the same.

But how do the implied odds influence my decision now?
We both have 0,73$ left -> there is no fold equity.
I am also sure that he will get it on the turn if I call on the flop.
So my odds on the flop are 33% (risking 0,91$ to win 2,74$) but my implied odds are 39% (risking 1,63$ to win 4,19$)

As my odds are only 32% does this mean that this is a fold???

Apologies if this belongs is some kind of beginners thread...

Villain is 26/16/12.5 with AF 1,0 and Ag% 30% after 30 hands

We have 7 nut outs. He potted us so we are getting 2:1. Probably threes are good too. So you think he has a set. We should still discount the threes so let's count them as two outs. know 7 cards, 45 left, we like 9 of them, so that is 9:36 or 1:4. So you are 4:1 against improving to the turn and getting 2:1. Villain probably will stack off if you call and hit if he has a set because there is going to be 2:40 in the pot you will have only 70 cents left. But since you can't possibly make up the extra 96 x 2 with your 70 cents on the turn even if you do hit I advise a fold. With 92 cents in the middle and 160 in your stack you need about 38%? to stack off. Against any 55 you have 33%. So actually you probably should stack off since he could have other holdings aside from a set.

also probably over limping instead of raising pre should be looked at as well as checking flop. not to say that your line was wrong but these look like viable alternatives as well.

This is an easy stack off if SB's x/r GII range is wider than sets and 2p, such as some sd+fd combo which we have dominated.