readless on villain. Very first hand in session i believe. I'm in BB...

i just call b/c i had no clue what dude was doing. Should we reraise?

the way he played it feels heavily weighted towards j3xx, 3! the river

Lol raise.

yah lol indeed raise river

As odd as this sounds felt like AA...Seen so many people limp UTG AA. But yeah, I probably should have raised.

Doubt that any player chek AA twice behind

3bet / call4bet

Nit.

You post a lot. Most of the time your logic seems sound. I'm a bit surprised you are even asking this question. This spot should always be a raise/get it in spot. Sure, maybe villain got creative/stupid with AAxx, but it doesn't happen often enough to warrant slowing down with your hand.

if he has AA its really really horrible play on his part.
Surely he is betting flop and turn with AA to try and build a half decent pot.

First hand on villain, just not sure what he'd wait 2 streets to insta raise with. 33 is also a possibility.

It's tough readless because we don't know villain's range because villain limped and we were in the BB. I suppose we could have raised pre, but readless and OOP I don't like raising this hand pre.

I still agree it should be a reraise but in this particular case glad I didn't.

Villain had AAxx.

Ah man, don't be results orientated.
If he plays AA like this he'll play A3/39/99/J3 like this. It's a tiny pot so we can r/f ez.
No way I'm raising pre btw.

Not being results oriented...lol. That's why I posed the hand. Even though I lost I thought it would have been more correct to raise his reraise! Something in the air smelled fishy to me and I just called. but in a vacuum I think it's more correct to raise.

But I know a few players who will play AA like this.

Also, 33 is almost never in his range here. It would be a really bad play for villain to not bet flop with set of 3's. Again, this type of play would happen so infrequently that you will still be profitable by raising. Sorry you lost, but IMO you misplayed the hand by not reraising river.

Agreed.