I am just wondering who thinks this is just a clear flop fold?
Villain is 26/16 with 2 Afq, Folds to c-bet 80% over 20 occassions. He just has a dangler here and it has hit? I don't think villain calls pot from CO with 77 even if he does play 30% on the button.
Using PPT I think I am about 2:1 vs his range on the flop so calling one is not terrible. This just depends if villain is raising A2 here or whether this is only ever 77. If it is only 77 then i am abviously in poor shape.
Either way, when you have ~33% equity against villain's flop raising range, it's a clear fold on that street, for similar reasons as we discussed in the other thread where direct pot odds were "enough" the calling ended up -EV. It would be a lot different if your outs were nuttier.
not a good spot for him to bluff, altho he can be overplaying his own OP +fd if he is a donk where you have him wrecked, to a greater amount than his 77 has you wrecked. Problem is the bad players have a 2 often also
given your reads it seems like an easy fold on flop
fold to cbet stat is interesting over a small sample, as say he is just 1 tabling he is going to be going on a slight tilt from missing flops so much... maybe
I am agree you have to fold given reads on the flop. Without reads I would fold too, only with reads about the villain beeing overly aggresive I may think about a call here.
Anyway, what do you think guys about check/calling this spot? It's looks great for it because no turn card scare us so we control the pot with a great hand and encourages the BU to stab with a wide range when we check, and if he doesn't great, we make this hand a 2 street one