Hey guys I just wanted to know a little bit more about calling 3bet oop.
This hand has 36% equity against 5% 3betting range, the villain here is 3betting about 5%. So we only need 33% right?
But would we want a hand stronger than 33% since we're OOP and we likely wont realize as much riv equity. We're sometimes dominated and rake also has to have a factor. Basically i'm asking what kind of equity should i be looking for when defending OOP. ex. 38%?
PokerStars Hand #3333217852: Omaha Pot Limit ($0.50/$1) - 2016/07/26 23:07:50
Table '#10874709' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($100 in chips)
Seat 2: PLR_2252186LF ($102.20 in chips)
Seat 3: PLR_5530193ON ($185.46 in chips)
Seat 4: PLR_1136599SW ($107.10 in chips)
Seat 5: PLR_3710920UU ($176.54 in chips)
Seat 6: PLR_6612873ZR ($52.30 in chips)
PLR_1136599SW: Set dealer [4]
PLR_3710920UU: posts small blind $0.50
PLR_6612873ZR: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Hero [Tc Js Jd Ks]
Hero: raises $3.50 to $3.50
PLR_2252186LF: folds
PLR_5530193ON: folds
PLR_1136599SW: raises $12 to $12
PLR_3710920UU: folds
PLR_6612873ZR: folds
Hero: calls $8.50
*** FLOP *** [Qh Ac 2h]
Hero: checks
PLR_1136599SW: bets $19.50
Hero: folds
Uncalled bet ($19.50) returned to PLR_1136599SW
PLR_1136599SW: shows [As 9c Td Qc]
PLR_1136599SW collected $24.25 from pot
Those numbers aren't useful. PPT's top-5% range has a lot of big pairs and high-card hands that people don't 3-bet when they 3-bet a 5% range. Many of those hands also happen to dominate your specific holding. Against PJ's more human-like 4% (!) 3-bet range, you already have 40% equity.
Those numbers aren't useful. PPT's top-5% range has a lot of big pairs and high-card hands that people don't 3-bet when they 3-bet a 5% range. Many of those hands also happen to dominate your specific holding. Against PJ's more human-like 4% (!) 3-bet range, you already have 40% equity.
To Rei's point, I seriously doubt that the hand the villain showed down is in the top 5% of hands.
