Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Any reason to not 3-bet? Any reason to not 3-bet?

11-05-2014 , 04:27 PM
Hey, this hand worked out pretty fine for me, just wondering if there might be a reason to not 3bet my hand preflop. Thx

Pot Limit Omaha US$0.01/US$0.02
PokerStars
4 players
Formatted by pokercopilot.com - Mac OS X hand history analysis and tracking

Stacks:
UTG - UTG (US$3.00)
BTN - BTN (US$2.29)
SB - SB (US$2.53)
BB - Hero (US$2.00)

Preflop: (US$0.03, 4 players) Hero is BB with A K A J
UTG calls US$0.02, 1 fold, SB raises to US$0.06, Hero raises to US$0.20, 1 fold, SB calls US$0.14

Flop: 3 3 3 (US$0.42, 2 players)
SB bets US$0.41, Hero raises to US$1.64, SB raises to US$2.33 (all-in), Hero calls US$0.16 (all-in), Uncalled bet of US$0.53 returned to SB

Turn: 6 (US$4.02, 2 players, 1 all-in)

River: 9 (US$4.02, 2 players, 1 all-in)

Total Pot: US$4.02
SB shows K 2 K 9 (a full house, Threes full of Kings)
Hero shows A K A J (a full house, Threes full of Aces)

Hero wins US$3.89
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
11-05-2014 , 04:34 PM
entire hand is really standard.
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
11-05-2014 , 04:41 PM
ok thx.
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
11-05-2014 , 04:50 PM
3b is fine. Jamming the flop is terrible.
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
11-05-2014 , 04:59 PM
ok, why?
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
11-05-2014 , 05:38 PM
In simple terms: calling keeps in bluffs and doesn't lose value against worse boats that decide to pot out (those are getting stacks in later anyway). If you do raise, it should be to the minimum.
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
11-05-2014 , 05:55 PM
You got lucky here, seeing as having K blocker and villain being so bad. So the hand is not standard.

Raising vs bad players is perfectly fine if they susceptible to think your bluffing
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
11-05-2014 , 05:59 PM
i see. thank you
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
11-05-2014 , 06:03 PM
btw calling range is not even that different to raising range, don't think I ever flat but min raising can tilt people, also he can have 2-4 outs
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
11-06-2014 , 01:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yayacmtex
Hey, this hand worked out pretty fine for me, just wondering if there might be a reason to not 3bet my hand preflop.
Not doing this to the pot raise button would be bad:

Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
12-03-2014 , 06:52 AM
3bet pre is standard, as you are very likely to play this pot heads up ip with a premium hand.

I would minraise on the flop too.
Especially with the K blocker villain is more unlikely to have KK, and is often folding everything worse to a potraise on the flop: wawb scenario.
If you minraise and get called, the psr on the turn will be 2:1, and its likely that you will get paid out the rest by a worse full.
If you just call on the flop, psr is worse then 1:1 and its harder to get your stack in good.
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
12-03-2014 , 08:18 AM
Call flop, call all the way.

You only won so much with your line because villain sucks and he also had a pretty good hand.
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
12-03-2014 , 10:20 AM
I played a very similar hand the other day, the only real difference was the flop came 888 instead of 333 which was seen 3 ways...BB donk bet the flop, I called from the co and the button called. Turn Bb check, I bet button calls bb folds. I jam the river, get called Button has the last 8. I had no stats on the button player, so assumed he doesn't play much so he could call down with ttxx +..
What do you guys make of this play? Right? Wrong? Fishy? Lol
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
12-03-2014 , 01:18 PM
^ That is way harder to stack off then OP hand.

More players in the hand, and 888 is more likely to connect with a range than 333

BTN calling flop is very worrying after bet and call already.
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
12-03-2014 , 11:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mt.FishNoob
^ That is way harder to stack off then OP hand.

More players in the hand, and 888 is more likely to connect with a range than 333

BTN calling flop is very worrying after bet and call already.
+1
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote
12-04-2014 , 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yayacmtex
Any reason to not 3-bet?
Yes there are a couple very valid reasons not to 3-bet here

Spoiler:
Your internet disconnects, or you accidentally time out and fold
Any reason to not 3-bet? Quote

      
m