On the flop my plan was exacltly this , i check if small stack bet , big stack pass , i call , but if the big stack showing any interest to the pot i give up .
I need on the flop 17% of eq to be break even , against this 22$ bet.
pro poker tools saying against 5% range we have 40% eq , what is strange for me , i thought i have much less.
board: QcJh9s
Hand Equity Wins Ties
AcAs8cAd 41.66% 978,975 23
5% 58.34% 1,371,122 23
Preflop: Hero is SB with A A 8 A
UTG folds, MP raises to $1.75, 2 folds, Hero calls $1.50, BB raises to $7, MP calls $5.25, Hero raises to $28, BB calls $21, MP calls $21
Flop: ($84) Q J 9 (3 players)
Hero checks, BB bets $22 and is all-in, MP folds, Hero calls $22
Turn: ($128) Q (2 players, 1 is all-in) River: ($128) 2 (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Spoiler:
Results: $128 pot ($3 rake)
Final Board: Q J 9 Q 2
Hero showed A A 8 A and lost (-$50 net)
BB showed K T T K and won $125 ($75 net)
MP mucked and lost (-$28 net)
pro poker tools saying against 5% range we have 40% eq , what is strange for me , i thought i have much less.
board: QcJh9s
Hand Equity Wins Ties
AcAs8cAd 41.66% 978,975 23
5% 58.34% 1,371,122 23
A 5% PPT range isn't exactly like a real 3-betting range in this spot. It has a ton of KKxx, many that are still one pair on this texture, and not enough high rundowns -- even hands like QJT9ds are excluded.
The PJ 3-bet ranges show a different story. It's still a stack off but you get more reasonable equity values.