i think villain is a reg, but not much of a sample to matter, not fish for sure

this spot confused me to no end w no info
if i check he doesn't have much to bluff with and also when he checks back a lower straight i feel like an idiot
but then again, what calls me if i bet...
i myself prefer to bet tbh and choose my own sizing what i would check call anyway, dont expect to get raised often without villain having stone cold nuts...i could have a house myself easily
against weaker players i think i valuebet that river all day long, i just expect to get raised by sets otf, yeh the lonely weak 2p gets there too, but meh

thoughts?

Poker Stars $0.25/$0.50 Pot Limit Omaha Hi $0.10 Ante - 5 players
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

UTG: $159.88
CO: $115.00
BTN: $119.55
SB: $329.01
Hero (BB): $366.25

Pre Flop: ($1.25) Hero is BB with A A T 7
1 fold, CO calls $0.50, 1 fold, SB calls $0.25, Hero raises to $2.50, CO calls $2, SB calls $2

Flop: ($8.00) 6 2 9 (3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $6.75, CO calls $6.75, SB calls $6.75

Turn: ($28.25) 8 (3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $23.75, CO calls $23.75, SB folds

River: ($75.75) 2 (2 players)
Hero ?

I know you're a HU reg and raising a set would be standard given the aggressive nature and wider ranges of HU but 230+bb deep and raising middle or bottom set with no backup and this SPR still would be pretty bad since if you end up GII you are never going to be in great shape.

Having said that, villain shouldn't have many 22 in his range esp with a limp/call. Plus it's just 1 combo. 62 and 92 again not too many combos of it pre and further reduced by the fact he called again OTT.

I think river sizing for me would be 1/3 pot or 3/4+. I think HP or similar sizing would be pretty bad since it looks too much like a value bet and I think 57 and ofc anything weaker (maybe OP + FD?) is folding too. A big sizing and we can look more bluffy and villain might be more likely to hero call with 57 where as with HP he might hero fold it.

Not too sure which is better - if we've been aggressive then I definitely like the bigger bet-sizing.

Thx
Yea i agree that it would be bad to raise naked non top set with that spr, im still trying to adjust to the 6max dynamics and often feel lost and feel like everyone is underrepping their hands, i valuebet too thin and then am surprised to see villains holding decent hands. got to work on that

Are you betting a set on the turn?
How do you think the river (and the runout) interacts with Hero/Villains perceived ranges?

Not folding

Betting with set yes

Not sure about perceived ranges, that's where the confusion part comes in.
I just don't see him having one thing way more than other thing, meaning hands that beat us vs draws/worse straight.
Also no idea how he perceives me, but if he is a thinking player he would maybe thought the same. Meaning i probably barrel sets, straight and even when i just cbet naked flushdraw and get a nutstraightdraw on the turn, which further means i bluff my missed draws 100% of the time (unless i have a showdown/bluffcatching hand, then it doesnt make sense, like naked AA) on that river.

You mean chk fold? That's not even an option i think.

X/C

i missread. prolly just bet.call smal, chk call or shove, they are only real options and just go by subconcious intuition, not giving anything more away than that

I bet $44 and he snap with a 66 boat.