Villain only have 100 hands on him and hes super nova 31/24 , 2.0 aggro factor 10PLO zoom, he bet 2 out of 8 rivers I have on him.

PokerStars - $0.10 PL Hi FAST (6 max) - Omaha Hi - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 41.8 BB
Hero (SB): 227.2 BB
BB: 76.4 BB
UTG: 114.6 BB
MP: 211.6 BB
CO: 112.7 BB
Hero posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has 8 9 T 7

fold, MP raises to 3.5 BB, fold, fold, Hero raises to 11.5 BB, fold, MP calls 8 BB

Flop: (24 BB, 2 players) J 2 K
Hero checks, MP checks

Turn: (24 BB, 2 players) 7
Hero bets 14.2 BB, MP calls 14.2 BB

River: (52.4 BB, 2 players) 9
Hero bets 45.2 BB, MP raises to 185.8 BB


Hey curious on peoples opinions, I don't post hands often was hoping to get some views on this spot

Thanks for any and all thoughts!



Results/my thoughts if anyone is curious :

I would have played pretty much every street different here. 200bb vs MP open I'm just flatting this hand in the sb. If I did 3b, I'm definitely c betting that board. If I somehow 3b pre and checked the flop, I'm also checking the turn. If I got to the river exactly like you did here, I'm checking.

I agree with adebisi 100%

I think that if he's getting stubborn with two pairs he's not turning them into a bluff on the end... this deep I would expect a set to raise at some point to get more money in... I think when you get here this way it's a good fold ... I just don't know if KJ pays us off when we bet this big on the river which maybe makes it a river check...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Preflop your 3bet range should be pretty high card, high pair heavy so I like cbetting this board. The 3bet preflop isn't completely unreasonable as for board coverage, you'll be able to take some profitable check/ call and check/ raise lines against an aggressive opponent that will be trying to represent the boards you hit well with this hand. As played you can bet fold river as competent villain can still have QT here (i.e. he shouldn't be stabbing with all of his QT combos when checked to OTF)

What do you mean with the term board coverage?

Do you think that default for villian should be stab here with bare QT? What if the board had a flushdraw? Better to check-back in that case?

Board coverage means having some smaller cards in your range so that you can have good hands on low flops. When you 3bet only AA, KK and AKQ9ds type hands you have no straights or two pairs on 678 flops.

QT should stab the flop really often here because of stack depth. With 8 nut outs and money behind he can't be priced out by a check raise

Agree the 3bet is fine to blow out at the very least the BB and have postflop initiative in a heads up pot. Calling is ok I guess since we are deep. That said, we need to be cbetting this board with our hand, as it hits our 3bet range fairly hard and we have 2nd nut gut only. Checking you are giving up, unless you intend to represent top/middle set or some such crazy **** without any blockers to it, which would be a bad idea vs. a range that also continues strongly on this board, so checking the turn is our only option after we check the flop.

The river I can't see him having anything but QT, I doubt he is bluffing, I prefer a smaller bet for thin value as played and obv fold.