And wtf at this? Of course there are other, more plausible explanations.

New theory: Laak had AQ, the production messed it up and then party poker ran with it for the publicity?

Idk, just finding it really hard that Laak would ever muck a winner or call with A6.

lol, unreal..
also reminded me of this hand: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr2agX80ZyE

Acid flashback is my guess.

Brain tumour obv

or he has other things on his mind...

I don't understand why people were saying there was an accidental slow roll.

Laak didn't want to flip his hand over while the board was dealt. The other guy was happy to. That doesn't mean he should have thought he was ahead. He's just got to wait until the river and see if Laak claims the pot or mucks.

You could say Laak is letting the other guy think he is winning when he isn't once the 6 hits (ignoring the mis-read) and that's what a slow roll is. But this is rather different since it's already clear Laak isn't revealing his hand until the river whatever comes.

And if you think Laak ought to have shown his cards when the 6 hit the turn that would make it a deliberate slow roll rather than accidental.

Fyp

Nope - it appears as though it was just a brain fart. Here's his explanation of the hand:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLCCi6fIIpI

laak knew he had the winner

AK hearts beats one pair, new rule, if played with aura.

just no way he didnt know ,,,him of people especially

Uhm, you see a way in the video above.

LOL I just can't believe there's people here stupid enough to think that Laak would give away 100k out of embarrasment from slow rolling. You lack all understanding of the value of money, and are a danger to yourselves.

There's only 2 explanations:
1. He forgot/missread his hand or was not thinking clearly.
2. Production error

Seriously it's worrying the amount of clueless posts on this forum, you're supposed to be poker players, you're supposed to be able to come up with logical reasons behind peoples actions.

QFT