I actually speak czech, so i can translate that part of the interview for you:

"What lead me to calling? I think that Zohar, if he really had the nuts as he was representing, or trying to represent, would definitely lead out. As he did with 98, when he had a flush, and i payed him off with ace high, because i wanted to see what he had. I also wanted to see his reaction.

I think if he really had 45, he would just lead out. I also had a blocker with Q4. I wasnt really thinking about that when i was considering calling, i was just thinking that he's only really representing 45. I looked at him - he turned red. When your daughter is lying, she also turns red, thats how you can tell that she's lying. And that dude, when i was talking to him, was totally red and when i mentioned that he either has T8 or 65 turned red even more. I thought he was bluffing.

Then i looked at his legs, they were stiff and wrapped around his chair (probably not correct, i'm not sure how to translate this). I knew it was a bluff, i was just wondering whether i should just call or jam. So i called. I was 100% sure he had T8 or 65. He turned over J8, so that was good too. I think his behavior was obvious. I check raised the turn with the intention of betting big on the river if the flush completes. He would just call the river with two pair, with some A9 or A3..."

i think this marek guy isn´t a donk and just played the hand very well and sould read the other guy.

hi marek

Wow, thanks for sharing!

Should have titled it "Incredibly Stupid Queen High Call."

first and foremost, the money was chopped, which immediately brings it from incredible to meh.
2nd, he's beating JT, J8, T8, 86, 65, 64, and all the clubs Jack or lower, AND he's getting close to 4 to 1.

he obviously bet the river to bluff like the pair of 3s, and when he got check-raised he felt his opponent was polarized

poker tattoo = donk

I prob woulda made that call with JT there