Here's a text recap of the hand:
http://www.burnandturn.com/poker/sch...vincent-final/
Now here's a video of the hand:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esp7gXv63Xs
Notice the 8c on the board and in Hugh's hand. Notice at 0:36 the commentator says "...that's a terrible flop, three dull cards, unsuited..."
Huh? The text recap shows a suited board.
Since I can't find any mention of this, and since I cannot believe that NO ONE would've noticed the two 8c's on the table (plenty of spectators obv), I have to conclude that:
(a) this was not a mistake by ESPN thru post-production addition of an incorrect overhead flop shot (same reasoning, it would've been noted by now), and
(b) this is a pretty decent fake (because they'd have to alter the audio in addition to the video)
Which is it? The video ends by listing Russ as the "1993 World Champion", which he was not (Jim Bechtel was)... more evidence that this whole video is a throw-away?
EDIT: At 1:00, the floor announcer claims Hugh can win with runner runner spades??????? WTF