If you can't do it right, why do it at all? The huge amount of technical glitches during the main WSOP live stream with commentary make them look like a bunch of rank amateurs, or like apkrnewb said, it comes across like they don't seem to care enough about the viewers to put out a professional quality broadcast.
The only time I could ever get the second stream to run without buffering eveyr 5 seconds was when it ran on something called "**********", where it worked perfectly. Don't know why they would use this service only a few times, and the rest of the time run it on their on own screwed up server. At least you can watch the vids of many of the secondary streams which seem to play perfectly, albeit after the fact, on wsop.com. Just click on "Videos" at the top of the page.
Also, check out my post on David Tuchman's commentary this year here,
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...8&postcount=97.
I do agree though with some of the previous posters ITT who said he can be a bit boring when he doesn't have any guests, but also I give him huge props for being able to fill and keep going on those 8+ hour long shifts, especially with having hardly any breaks when compared to a typical network commentator.
I'm really sad that the live streaming with commentary is over for this year cause I've really enjoyed it, although now I'm rooting for Tuck to go big in his first time playing the Main Event. Haven't checked lately, but I know he had been in the Top 150 on his opening day, 1C.
Add: The secondary stream ran a few times on a service called " L I V E S T R E A M", where it ran great. No idea why the name of this service got censored above. It's hardly a bad word or anything.
Last edited by PokerAnnie32; 07-08-2014 at 03:54 PM.
Reason: Clarification