Mod edit:
Thread has evolved a bit. You can use it now for ROI discussion (software is OK if you don't go crazy). DO not post hands here. Do not discuss strat or specific regs (unless you're here ldo). Appropriate sample is 10k+.

Aye aye,

This topic is for all regulars at the 9-superturbo's @ Pokerstars. So Jekagame, Dron_win, i_like_idiot, 2almaz, woniuqidaxia, dyrkabes, icho90, Die Bibi, dani_inet, any2pusherR and others.

I've noticed these days more people (and regulars) are playing these sit-and-go's. More then a hundred run an hour. The sad thing is there's only a 7$ buy-in. So:
A) The regulars will play all in the same pool
B) There's no way to move up at all

So if Pokerstars make's 15$'s too (and maybe 30's but not necessary yet) there will be:
A) Less regulars in the same game
B) A way to move up for players
C) More to win
D) More rake for Pokerstars.

I've sent an e-mail to the Starssupport one week ago but I'm not sure if this "onemansaction" will do a lot, so if you agree please post your motivation in this topic (I might can send it to the support afterwards or Stars will read it here) or write a mail too .

Thanks a lot and good luck at the tables (except for Jekagame hihi jk),
F### Forever

PS: Sorry for the poor English, but I hope it's readable.

Stars reps have said they dont want to add more buyins as they dont want to hurt the 9man traffic more than they already are.

gl with your efforts though, i would love to see other buyins for the 9man hypers. Getting together with other regs and posting in stars threads and pming stars reps is probably a better way to go about it than email regular customer support.

No thanks.

No.

Before adding in any other 9max hypers, they need to add in $60 6max hypers ainec

Okay Stars, let's just settle for 2 level rebuy hypers? Either that or lots more buyins for 6 and 9-max hypers by early next year.

Now how would that be fair?

All goes by demand, theres way more demand for higher stakes 6max than any BI level of FR hypers.

+ It's an ez super +ev business decision for PS in terms of rake

There were 351 players playing the 9-man $7 hypers at peak time last night and 246 playing the 6-max $30 hypers. This doesn't suggest to me there are more players wanting higher buy-ins for 6-max, in fact quite the opposite.

The 9-mans need $15 and $30 buy-ins desperately.

LOL at comparing $7 9mans to $30 6max, thats simply idiotic

I bet there were 3-4x as many $7 6mans running as 9 mans

Edit: In the last 10 mins, 42 $7 6mans have popped while 10 $7 9 man's have popped

Why aren't the guys playing the $7 6-max playing the $30 6-max? Because they don't want to play the higher buy-in. They don't even come into this discussion, they aren't demanding a $60 buy-in, clearly.

You have to compare the highest buy-in available. And right now $15+ 9-mans are needed more than the $60 6-max.

Anyway it's not about having one or the other stars would surely add both if they wanted to.

Okay I'll agree with you here for sure. I do think this line needs to be changed to "stars needs to add both if they like money and to keep the customers pleased."

I think they should "trial" $15 hyper 9 mans and $60 hyper 6man's for a 2 week period or so and see how traffic fairs at each and how traffic is affected at the lower buyins, and I'm pretty sure they'd like the results and would keep both.

I'd like 15 dollar 6max hypers please. if you didn't want to **** with the regular and turbo sngs you shouldn't have ****ed the rake .

(although these HT games are seriously rigged. )

$15 hypers would ruin the already slow turbos. NO CHANCE! Learn a proper game you poofs!

Why ain't this a proper game? My ROI is higher then most "normal turbo's"regulars...

nice post