Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy

Notices

STT Strategy Discussion about the play of single table tournaments.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2008, 10:10 AM   #61
old hand
 
LeadbellyDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Repping from midnight to high noon
Posts: 1,921
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

Do all those lines eventually converge on 100%?
LeadbellyDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 10:49 AM   #62
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
rakemeplz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: worshipping kevmode
Posts: 7,925
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattiesmat View Post
What does the red "worst" line in first graph mean?
Very worst would be -100% ROI, right?
Is it realistically worst?
And what are the odds of running close to worst?
I think the "profit distributionn" graph besides the first graph shows how reasonable it is to run X above or below expectations, obv (though sample size is limited really for the outlyers or whatever). I think you can say it would be VERY unlikely to run more than likely 20% off your true expectation over 5000 sngs just based on the first graph where the worst sample was still +ROI.
rakemeplz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 11:02 AM   #63
veteran
 
ryanmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: drunk and ready to destroy
Posts: 2,892
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

this is neat
ryanmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 12:46 PM   #64
adept
 
Innocent Kitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: drinkin' jaeger all day
Posts: 715
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanmack View Post
this is disgusting, makes me want to puke, and makes me want to give up playing poker foreverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
fyp
Innocent Kitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 03:33 PM   #65
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
rakemeplz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: worshipping kevmode
Posts: 7,925
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

Quote:
Originally Posted by rakemeplz View Post
I think the "profit distributionn" graph besides the first graph shows how reasonable it is to run X above or below expectations, obv (though sample size is limited really for the outlyers or whatever). I think you can say it would be VERY unlikely to run more than likely 20% off your true expectation over 5000 sngs just based on the first graph where the worst sample was still +ROI.
Actually after some thinking and a little testing my post is extremely inaccurate, I think for 9% true ROI would run at -2% maaaaybe once in a million samples. So much worse than that is very unlikely IMO.
rakemeplz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2008, 11:49 PM   #66
stranger
 
O.Romero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Taking calculated risks.
Posts: 12
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

So, the conclusion of this thread is that it's best to play at the limit in which your ROI is highest and that a downswing is inevitable, correct?
O.Romero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2008, 11:52 PM   #67
old hand
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boycotting Coca-Cola
Posts: 1,840
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

I'm pretty sure that the conclusion of this thread was that we should all learn cash... that, and that it really is possible that I can drop $700 in one hour of 27s and still might not suck at poker.
CheeseMoney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 12:06 AM   #68
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
blackize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,534
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

Quote:
Originally Posted by O.Romero View Post
So, the conclusion of this thread is that it's best to play at the limit in which your ROI is highest and that a downswing is inevitable, correct?
Nah just play where your hourly is highest and be prepared for sickening swings.
blackize is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 12:07 AM   #69
veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: @pokernobody
Posts: 2,344
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

Quote:
Originally Posted by CheeseMoney View Post
I'm pretty sure that the conclusion of this thread was that we should all learn cash... that, and that it really is possible that I can drop $700 in one hour of 27s and still might not suck at poker.
And you think that can't happen in cash? Or more?

If you played 32 x $27's in that hour - what cash level would that equate to?
Aussie Rhino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 12:11 AM   #70
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
blackize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,534
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussie Rhino View Post
And you think that can't happen in cash? Or more?

If you played 32 x $27's in that hour - what cash level would that equate to?
Assuming a 100 buyin bankroll for SNGs 100nl would be the most comparable cash game. And yes $700+ downswings can and do happen there
blackize is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 12:14 AM   #71
stranger
 
O.Romero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Taking calculated risks.
Posts: 12
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackize View Post
Nah just play where your hourly is highest and be prepared for sickening swings.
Ok, thank you for the clarification.
O.Romero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 12:15 AM   #72
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,281
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackize View Post
Assuming a 100 buyin bankroll for SNGs 100nl would be the most comparable cash game. And yes $700+ downswings can and do happen there
it can happen in 21 minutes imo.
GtrHtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 02:44 AM   #73
Pooh-Bah
 
xPeru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SNE @ life; home in Peru
Posts: 4,006
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

Quote:
Originally Posted by GtrHtr View Post
it can happen in 21 minutes imo.

QFT, QFT
xPeru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 10:22 AM   #74
stranger
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

All of this info on variance is great, however I would like to make a point on upswings also.

If I am a proven 10% roi sng player, I have tremendous odds in my favor. Much like a casino taking a small edge to grind gramblers down to nothing, 10% roi is a big deal. I do not have actual stats but I imagine a 50 BI downswing is probably equally as likely as a 150 BI upswing, after all
I am a winning player.

Keep in mind 10% Roi only needs 10 sngs to make 1 Buyin. Seeing a chart of a5000 sample size would generate 500 buyins. Unless your run of bad luck comes quickly, your profits should be able to withstand the downswing when comes. Unless of course you are living off the profits with a flat bankroll. Then the downswing will be trouble.
jeff214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 12:37 PM   #75
Pooh-Bah
 
Into2ndWind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: -______-
Posts: 4,613
Re: STT Simulations: a graphical look into variance

this is amazing thread, cant believe i didnt see this b4... 20 buyin downswings are very common if u start 20 tabling and putting in volume... two back to back bad sets and gg...
Into2ndWind is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive