Quote:
Originally Posted by Moldran
I'd definitely fold A4o in that spot, in such situations it's best to go into a folding war and let others do mistakes
That's too general a statement. Expected "Mistakes" of opponents can also lead to making it better to call/jam wider ranges than gto.
Example:
In the above hand, imagine the big stack is some rnd who likes certain cards and dislikes others, not very adaptive to a specific situation. That's an observable trait of a decent amount of recs. So if he somehow likes top 30% of hands and minimally adapts to the situation by jamming 35% on the other shorty, he is gonna walk him 65% while he should walk him 0% in GTO. Now ceteris paribus, jamming wider than gto (or better: in the same spot with SB jamming 100% and calling your jam with his actual calling range + identical bb calling range and future ranges etc. pp., not gto) is optimal. And: Always remember that u got other options than openshoving as well. And be it just raise non-AI to keep the option to fold after two jams. Poker not that easy
Fwiw I've been in a lot of spots like this where I judged opp ranges s.t. folding A4o is indeed opt. In way more spots where I found it opt. to jam tho, it's pretty much auto-jam if sb is a decent reg. And if he is a tricky dude and you're about even in stacks with the other shorty, there might be future spots where cl can abuse that by walking the bb once to keep pressure on you.
Last edited by LeaksSuck; 06-13-2016 at 10:22 AM.