villain 39/12 3.1 agr after 83 hands non filtered

I think it'll be better to chech pre, you don't have a great hand. You can raise as well if you believe he's limp folding a lot; but you definitely have to raise more than 60, I think 90 is good. As played i think it's better to push the flop. Is very unlikely he had something on this board and your effective stack is not so big compared to the pot.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using 2+2 Forums

You got to call down vs these bets.. odds too good, no point in raising, nh. Pre is fine ofc if you haven't been crazy against him previously. ajmo

IDK regret I can see a lot of reasons to raise flop. Sample is kinda small but vs a player who seems to like the middle button as much as villain does, one of the main reasons to call flop vs raising is so we can get away from hand if he continues to show strength.

You really want to fold turn if he 245? His line is weak imo and he reps nothing. If he check turn we bet. 3.1 ag means he raise more than call except preflop right? Not saying this is right just my thinking.

In general someone that prefers checking and calling to betting and raising isnt gonna bluff 2+ streets. But like i said sample is small so maybe cant draw that conclusion.

As far as his line i think that turn sizing screams strength. Id expect him to jam with FDs and high cards he's gonna be betting/bluffing. Feel like he has trips and better 9s a lot more often than he has FDs and air. Id disagree that he reps nothing, i think your 7x, q9+ and slowplayed pre overpair hands are donking that board and betting small enough to keep people in on turn quite often.

I think that's what ag means but not sure and for sure 81 hands of a hyper where you dont see flops as often isnt gonna give you a clear picture. The only reason im willing to take into account his vpip/pfr from this small sample is because of what an outliler 39/12 is.