|
|
| STT Strategy Discussion about the play of single table tournaments. |
03-05-2011, 05:18 PM
|
#106
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,195
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by iluvsheesh
I made supernova last year playing highstakes SNG's. I also was a winning player even w/o rakeback) What is different about me is I did this in a strange way, I never play more than 1 table at a time. At this point I have switched completely over to $100 fifty/50s and am doing extremely well(although as you correctly point out with a sample size of only 400 or so games the results don't mean that much) again, I still only play only 1 table at a time. If I continue at this pace I will again make supernova.
|
I have to say i'm pretty shocked by this, I thought you were a mass multi tabler like everybody else, I'm probably going to start talking to you at the tables if you only play 1 at a time
|
|
|
03-05-2011, 08:13 PM
|
#107
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 50% neither here/50% nor there
Posts: 235
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshfan
I have to say i'm pretty shocked by this, I thought you were a mass multi tabler like everybody else, I'm probably going to start talking to you at the tables if you only play 1 at a time 
|
umm...that will be pretty difficult for you to do since I think it's more important to know when the blinds are moving than to see/participate in the chat. Be happy to talk to you either here or via PM. Just curious, have we played together, whats your SN,etc.?
|
|
|
03-05-2011, 08:27 PM
|
#108
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,195
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by iluvsheesh
umm...that will be pretty difficult for you to do since I think it's more important to know when the blinds are moving than to see/participate in the chat. Be happy to talk to you either here or via PM. Just curious, have we played together, whats your SN,etc.? 
|
We have played together 13 times.
My screen name is ilu_xxxxx_7.
I like to chat at the tables  it's more fun than actually paying attention and trying to win
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 01:00 AM
|
#109
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 50% neither here/50% nor there
Posts: 235
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
hehe...I understand completely(As a matter of fact my wife and I met chatting while playing backgammon online; but the games were not for money). On a serious note, the main reason I love to only singletable and not chat is that my I really play much better and enjoy the game more when I can totally focus on one thing at a time, neanderthal as that may sound in todays age of multitasking.
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 07:55 AM
|
#110
|
|
adept
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: microstakes ftBE!
Posts: 776
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
Kzk, i ran your three hands.
KQo in the big blind - interestingly, running the ICM Nash Calculator Results and running sngwiz with sb's range at 100% produce two different results, albeit not by much (sngwiz says 19.9%). they both say call, but i think with any inclination that sb isn't pushing atc at you, you're letting go of KQ.
the next hand is an atc push if villain is calling only top 33% or tighter. ICM Nash Calculator Results says push 43, get called by 40
AJo - ICM Nash Calculator Results has us calling when utg is pushing 91%. i'm trying to think how wide i'd be pwning with that set up, and it's probably nowhere near 90%. my guess is i'm pwning with closer to 40%, possibly even tighter considering how the short stacks are playing. and i'm probably typical. even then, AJo is still enough to call, although not by much.
for those of you who want to see the equity calculations:
let us assume utg+1 will bust on his big blind. in that case, our stack would be worth $18.45 at end of tournament if we fold here.
if we call here, let's say bb overcalls with top 5%. in that case, 95% of the time, our equity at EOT would be $19.35 (ajo has 60.13% equity vs top 40%), 5% of the time, our equity would be $10.22 (ajo has 25% equity vs top 40% and top 5%), for a total of $18.89. and would be higher in practice due to the fact that we'd be a virtual lock to steal the blinds on the next hand the times we double up. so, basically, eqp is at least $.50 better than folding, and often up to like 3 bucks better. qed. who wants to check my math?
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 12:43 PM
|
#111
|
|
stranger
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
Guys,this is my first post so i am not quite familiar with all posting things. 
I play 20$ turbos and have played only about 80 tournaments,so i am still learning.
I have a pretty decent experience with don's (about 4500 tourney's 10 and 20 level),but obviously strategy in fifty50 is a bit different.
What do you all think about this hand?
Hero ($3,845)
BB ($2,535)
UTG ($1,010)
UTG+1 ($975)
CO ($3,630)
BTN ($3,005)
Dealt to Hero T  T
Pre Flop:UTG push,CO push,everybody else fold
Now in DoN this is a clear fold,but i am not sure what is correct play here?
Please post your thoughts.
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 01:46 PM
|
#112
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,195
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by pijisin
Guys,this is my first post so i am not quite familiar with all posting things. 
I play 20$ turbos and have played only about 80 tournaments,so i am still learning.
I have a pretty decent experience with don's (about 4500 tourney's 10 and 20 level),but obviously strategy in fifty50 is a bit different.
What do you all think about this hand?
Hero ($3,845)
BB ($2,535)
UTG ($1,010)
UTG+1 ($975)
CO ($3,630)
BTN ($3,005)
Dealt to Hero T  T
Pre Flop:UTG push,CO push,everybody else fold
Now in DoN this is a clear fold,but i am not sure what is correct play here?
Please post your thoughts.
|
Need to know the blind level, it's probably going to be a fold, but if the blinds were 250/500 for example then i'd call.
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 02:31 PM
|
#113
|
|
stranger
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
Sorry, blinds were 150/300
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 03:21 PM
|
#114
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 50% neither here/50% nor there
Posts: 235
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
Very interesting hand. I plugged it into the SNG Wizard program (I'm going to stress an oft-mentioned disclaimer that ICM has its limitations esp. with short stacks/high blinds involved)
Results
With Wiz "average" ranges call with TT+,ak
If everyone were playing Nash Eq. call with 99+,AQs,Ako
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 04:56 PM
|
#115
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,233
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
could you post the ranges wiz used? I feel like wiz has ppl push way too loose "on average" in these situations...
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 05:17 PM
|
#116
|
|
adept
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 825
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
tnx for the analysys twistedbeats
will mp u
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 05:38 PM
|
#117
|
|
stranger
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
Yes,i feel that the ranges are a little too wide,but i could be wrong.Funny thing is that i actually folded,but BB called as well with AKo.
So my next question is if i have called there,what hand range would be correct to call for BB?
Also, iluvsheesh,i was intrigued with your post about one tabling.I have a few questions for you,but i would like to pm you if you don't mind.
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 05:39 PM
|
#118
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Czech Republic - Prague
Posts: 262
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
What were the stats of CO? UTG would be pushing alot hands because of his little short stack, only against him I would go easy call but I am not sure if I want to play against three players on bubble and there is another one shortstacker and we have sure already made some profit with that stack. I would participate in that hand only with QQ+,
For me its fold.
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 05:49 PM
|
#119
|
|
stranger
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
CO is a tight regular on 20$ DoN's.I knew he wouldn't be out of line for sure,but still made me wondering what my calling range is there.
|
|
|
03-06-2011, 09:28 PM
|
#120
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 50% neither here/50% nor there
Posts: 235
|
Re: Fifty50 strat Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by pijisin
Yes,i feel that the ranges are a little too wide,but i could be wrong.Funny thing is that i actually folded,but BB called as well with AKo.
So my next question is if i have called there,what hand range would be correct to call for BB?
Also, iluvsheesh,i was intrigued with your post about one tabling.I have a few questions for you,but i would like to pm you if you don't mind.
|
For the cases I ran, ranges were as follows:
Wiz avg UTG push 36% Cutoff call 7.1%
Nash EQ UTG push 13.1% Cutoff call 8.0%
Interestingly, your calling range is very senstitive to calling of cutoff and very insensititive to pushing range of small stack(UTG)
Now if you had also called ,I don't think wiz can handle that case but it seems intuitive that BB range should be extremly tight and that ako would be clear fold.
Finally, yes please free free to PM me with questions anytime
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 AM.
|