Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob148
This is quite relevant. If this flop check raising range is very tight, then the opponent should have a tight turn raising range in response; a fold may be in order on the turn. If this flop check raising range is very loose, then the opponent should have a loose turn raising range in response; a 3 bet may be in order on the turn. If you have the Goldie Locks of flop check raising ranges, then I think a calldown is in order.
While this is theoretically what should happen, I think it's a gigantic flaw in poker logic to assume that your opponent plays correctly against your ranges. I'm never folding this against an unknown, no matter what my check-raising frequency is. Similarly, I'm never 3-betting this against an unknown, no matter what my check-raising frequency is.
In order for your conclusion to be correct, you need to make two unwarranted assumptions:
1) Your opponent actually knows your check-raising frequency
2) Your opponent actually knows how to adjust
Maybe at higher stakes you can start to think that way, but here it's the mistake of playing too much inside your own head and not enough with the player that you're actually against.
I think this is a 100% calldown with top pair until further information suggests otherwise. And that information needs to come from what I see my opponent do, not what I think I'm doing.
If I'm just spitballing numbers, I'd expect folding to be right for less than 20% of players. And I'd expect 3-betting to be right for less than 10% of players. And I think I'm being very generous on both counts.