Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit

Notices

Micro Stakes Limit Discussions of micro stakes limit Texas Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2010, 05:05 PM   #16
Won ****ty undertitle in BBB's Beanament
 
anfernee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,823
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

@dragonmir, readless, nh. w/a read, nh.
anfernee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:07 PM   #17
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Bulletproof Monk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Best in the world at what I do
Posts: 22,218
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

i dont mind chk back turn with some frequency against a lot of players but would prefer it without the Q as it puts us in tough spots on Q rivers

as played everything else is fine, i do cap if he 3bets the river
Bulletproof Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:32 PM   #18
adept
 
prfsr_cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Smithville, TN
Posts: 869
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

NH. Next!
prfsr_cain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:34 PM   #19
veteran
 
McNeese72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In our tailgate area
Posts: 3,315
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

Quote:
Originally Posted by prfsr_cain View Post
NH. Next!
Oh! A bot approved hand.


Doc
McNeese72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:36 PM   #20
Pooh-Bah
 
Cranberry Tea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,814
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

Is OK?


Poker Stars $0.25/$0.50 Limit Hold'em - 8 players
2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked

UTG posts a big blind (1 SB)

MP1 posts a big blind (1 SB)

Pre Flop: (3.4 SB) Hero is BTN with K J
UTG checks, 1 fold, MP1 checks, 1 fold, CO calls, Hero raises, 2 folds, UTG calls, 1 fold, CO calls

Flop: (8.4 SB) A A 8 (3 players)
UTG checks, CO checks, Hero bets, UTG calls, CO folds

Turn: (5.2 BB) 9 (2 players)
UTG checks, Hero bets...
Cranberry Tea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:39 PM   #21
Mean? Me?
 
fretelöo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 3bet std huhu
Posts: 8,896
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

sure.
fretelöo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:40 PM   #22
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Bulletproof Monk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Best in the world at what I do
Posts: 22,218
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

are you bluffing or valuebetting? i dont see what read could make this a utility bet

need reads etc
Bulletproof Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:45 PM   #23
adept
 
prfsr_cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Smithville, TN
Posts: 869
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

This hand may need it's own post?

Do not like turn bet.
prfsr_cain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:45 PM   #24
Pooh-Bah
 
JamesBJames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: regergitation doyle brtunshon, imo
Posts: 4,445
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

Depends, imo. Against a few types of people, I think it's okay, but I'd check back against the majority of opponents.
JamesBJames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:45 PM   #25
Pooh-Bah
 
Cranberry Tea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,814
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulletproof Monk View Post
are you bluffing or valuebetting? i dont see what read could make this a utility bet

need reads etc
He's new to the table, but posting UTG, all that calling, and the stakes makes me think he's a loose-passive. The turn bet seemed at the time like a reasonable semibluff, but I wasn't sure, so I saved it.


Edit: if this needs its own thread, just delete the poast, and I'll start a new thread.
Cranberry Tea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:45 PM   #26
veteran
 
Pid Koker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: no u
Posts: 3,079
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulletproof Monk View Post
are you bluffing or valuebetting? i dont see what read could make this a utility bet

need reads etc
I'm valuebetting this turn all day against a guy who posts UTG.
Pid Koker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:45 PM   #27
Mean? Me?
 
fretelöo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 3bet std huhu
Posts: 8,896
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulletproof Monk View Post
are you bluffing or valuebetting? i dont see what read could make this a utility bet

need reads etc
To be determined by villains response.
fretelöo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:46 PM   #28
veteran
 
Pid Koker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: no u
Posts: 3,079
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

Prfsr can "NH" 24 posts at the same time. Bot IMO.
Pid Koker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:51 PM   #29
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Bulletproof Monk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Best in the world at what I do
Posts: 22,218
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

Quote:
Originally Posted by fretelöo View Post
To be determined by villains response.
sorry what?

im asking if he is betting with the intent of folding out KQ and weak pairs, or if he is betting with the intent of getting a call from weaker Kx hands etc.

if he is really peeling the flop ultra light then we can chk back and induce a river bet. there arent many players we can 3 street KJ hi against on this board. otoh that really is the best card in the deck for us to value bet because all his broadway is obv peeling again if it peels the flop, along with hands like 75.

if he has a lot of pairs here and we think he is going to show them down a lot then we could possibly just save a bet and check back and fold rivers ui, raising Js and tanking Ks. otoh if we think he can fold weak pairs a lot then the semi bluff could be profitable
Bulletproof Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 05:56 PM   #30
newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 25
Re: *The Official "Standard, yes?" Checkup Thread*

I'm pretty sure I misplayed this one, but I'm also still learning how to think about odds correctly.


Poker Stars $0.02/$0.04 Limit Hold'em - 9 players
2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked

MP2 posts a big blind (1 SB)

Pre Flop: (2.5 SB) Hero is MP1 with T T
3 folds, Hero raises, 2 folds, BTN 3-bets, 1 fold, BB calls, Hero calls

Flop: (10.5 SB) 6 K 2 (3 players)
BB bets, Hero ??

I only have 4 hands on the BB (75/0/25) but I'm guessing he's got a king here, possibly a flush draw because he cold-called the 3! pf. I don't think I have the odds to call even at 11.5:1, but maybe with implied odds?
Kektek is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive