OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

[A_Schupick]

Originally Posted by boza011

Hi guys,

moved to 6 max .25/.5 few months ago, and this is result after 70k hands. Been doing pretty good, but would like someones opinion. Am I to aggressive? Anything else doing wrong?
Thx

I would maybe go to SD abit less,t ath seems a bit excessive and I think that you might have a better winrate if you do. nota ton, but mayble like 2%

I would CCPF less. i think the chances to do it in 6M are just not really that often, and honestly it's probably a small leak now, but will get way worse as you move up and have more aggressive opponents.

[A_Schupick]

Originally Posted by nyrugby

FBBtS way to much. 80% is about 40% to high really. it will get to be a huge drain on your BB/100 as you move up.

Perhaps raise a bit more PF? But, that's kind of something that might change based on stakes.

Everything else seems pretty good.

[Admania]

Hey Rugby

Nice looking stats, as I mentioned with the other guy I can't really fault your stats, overall they look pretty darn good.

There is only one small thing which I think you should pay attention. On the whole you are a positionally aware player obviously. However your 3 betting stats are slightly out of sync in the postionally aware stakes. The best position to 3 bet is on the button so your highest %age should come from there. I'm really nit picking here but maybe just have a look at your ranges and what and where you're getting those 3 bets in.

With my nit pick over, I'll just say good job, nice work and look to move up, you are more than ready with these stats.

[Admania]

Just a brief comment on went to showdown stats. It's really interesting because there seems to be differing ways of skinning the preverbial cat.

Here are two extreme examples from players at 0.25/0.50 full ring , both players have an excellent winrate above 2BB/100 over big samples 100k plus. One guy has a wtsd of 51! and and w$SD OF 49, the other guy only goes to showdown 29% with a w$sd of 57.

[nyrugby]

Originally Posted by A_Schupick

FBBtS way to much. 80% is about 40% to high really. it will get to be a huge drain on your BB/100 as you move up.

Perhaps raise a bit more PF? But, that's kind of something that might change based on stakes.

Everything else seems pretty good.

Thanks, are you talking about folding BB or SB? My FBBtS is around 31% now, are you saying I should lower my FSBtS to 40%

[medite]

Playing 6max, something to see in my stats? What iam doing good / wrong

http://s1.directupload.net/file/d/2842/9m24gud2_png.htm ( dont know why image aint working )

[medite]

oeps wrong forum part sorry !

[moomies]

Originally Posted by beeker

your Fold BB Vs Steal is too high. it should be in the 30-40 range.

[beeker]

Originally Posted by moomies

your Fold BB Vs Steal is too high. it should be in the 30-40 range.

Thanks! I'll check out what I'm doing, go back to compare against WITHG recommended range (which I think is around what you say).

[DougL]

I'd say that 50% FBBTS% is pretty common for people playing FR and starting out. It is going to come down naturally as you become more comfortable in blind situations. I agree that 58% is pretty high. However, rushing to become a 30% player may include some growing pains.

[ZombieDance]

Give leak in the statistics

[Trex8063]

Welcome.

There's actually a stats thread, where it might be more appropriate to post something like this.

At a glance, your stats look mostly OK for what I presume is 6max, though I'm not the best person to ask (don't use a HUD). Pf stats seem +/- marginally over-laggy (even for 6max), though if your edge is big post-flop, it may be fine. But I'd worry you could be playing a few trouble hands, particularly in early position.

Only other things I noted were that your flop c/r% may be a pinch low???? Maybe not; if you're only ever in pots where you have the pf initiative, maybe it's spot-on perfect (tbh, I don't know what a typical flop c/r% is). Turn cbet% also seems perhaps marginally low to me (at least if you're often HU at that point; maybe not if pots are often still multiway on the turn).

gl, and check out the FAQ and Library if you haven't already done so.

[PlusEVoz]

Getting back into FL after not playing for 6 years or so. I used to grind mostly 1/2, 2/4 and up to 10/20 6max, short handed and some HU online. The game was much different back then, and bonuses and RB much jucier. Never used PT, HUD, and only 4 tabled max, and that was pushing it!

So starting a fresh in this new world where the micro play out like 20/40 did not so long ago.

My game is LAG I suppose. I like playing short and usually stay at a table until it breaks up.

Obv this sample size is tiny, but is there anything that sticks out like a sore thumb? Still getting used to reading the data and what it all means.

[DougL]

We ask for 10K hand samples for stat posts. It averages some stats out a little. Your AF is high for your LAGTAG VP$IP/PFR. In really passive games it could be fine. It also could be the small sample size. I'd suggest playing another 9K hands and posting here again. First impression from this small sample is that you can probably win playing like this.

[PlusEVoz]

^ Thanks for the feedback. I understand what you are saying and the 10K rule makes a lot of sense. Will report back as I plan on playing a few at these stakes.

Guess I was just looking for a little re-assurance that I was on the right track....;-)