Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit

Notices

Micro Stakes Limit Discussions of micro stakes limit Texas Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2010, 11:14 AM   #31
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
dragon1893's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 11,055
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy2DaBeroy View Post
Flop c-bet seems low. Are you getting cold-called a lot or ending up in multi-way pots somehow?
I know many people like to cbet 100%. But I disagree with the concept. I won't cbet certain flop textures if it hit my opponents ranges a lot and/or if i have little fold equity on the flop.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy2DaBeroy View Post
Other than that, only issue I see is that your steaks are too low.
Meh

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy2DaBeroy View Post

(I think FBBtS is probably fine for these limits, but you could lower it a bit 1-2 limits higher.)
It's normally way lower I think. Was surprised by the numbers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuinthehouse View Post
as you noted 3! is too low from CO and btn and should obviously be trending up, not flat. FWIW Oink posted guidelines at some point which I kept in a poker notes s/s, they were

HJ 8-9%, CO 12-13%, OTB 18%.
I think the sample size is a bit biased here since I normally played in loose passive games and sample size too small. I don't think there are enough spots to 3! at the stakes I played. I played generally in loose passive games with hardcore game selection. Hard to 3bet a limper.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuinthehouse View Post
You should be stealing at least 50% otb, 46% is too low for your skill at these levels.
Maybe something I should review. People around here are normally on the nitty side. I remember getting called out for opening T8o in CO and K4 OTB. Maybe I should add them to my ranges again.

Last edited by dragon1893; 04-08-2010 at 11:33 AM.
dragon1893 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 11:18 AM   #32
Head in the Clouds
 
Leroy2DaBeroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: I bink therefore I jam.
Posts: 15,491
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragon1893 View Post
I know many people like to cbet 100%. But I disagree with the concept. I won't cbet certain flop textures if it hit my opponents ranges a lot and/or if i have little fold equity on the flop.
You don't have to get to 100% (you'll notice I'm only at a touch over 97%), and perhaps it's different at 6M or at these limits, but I'm oftentimes surprised when my c-bet takes it down on a drawy or middling flop or whatever. I think positionally, it can also buy you a lot of free cards.

I'm curious as your turn c-bet %.

Edit: Try a filter for times you c-bet the flop when you didn't have a pair and see what you get.
Leroy2DaBeroy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 11:30 AM   #33
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
dragon1893's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 11,055
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy2DaBeroy View Post
I'm curious as your turn c-bet %.

Edit: Try a filter for times you c-bet the flop when you didn't have a pair and see what you get.
I like to induce quite a lot at these stakes. I remember Party having many retards that would take a stab liberally if you checked to them. If you only wanted 1 bet to go in on turn and river, you could just check to them and let them do your job.

There was one thread last month where I argued with Boz about it. He said you need a read to make that play. Well, I can develop reads quickly.


And those stats are from december-january.

If i look at my stats this month at 6max, I'm playing 32/24. I think HUHU experience is helping me to lag it up even more.

Last edited by dragon1893; 04-08-2010 at 11:36 AM.
dragon1893 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 12:26 PM   #34
veteran
 
VDownSwingV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: on the dooterbus
Posts: 2,499
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuinthehouse View Post
as you noted 3! is too low from CO and btn and should obviously be trending up, not flat. FWIW Oink posted guidelines at some point which I kept in a poker notes s/s, they were

a. HJ 8-9%, CO 12-13%, OTB 18%.

b. You should be stealing at least 50% otb, 46% is too low for your skill at these levels.
a. +1
b. i'd be REALLY surprised if it gets folded around to reach 50% atts OTB.....even in the micros

c. samplesizeaments! @ dragon
VDownSwingV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 01:10 PM   #35
old hand
 
shuinthehouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: F U FTP, where's my $$$ at
Posts: 1,578
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by VDownSwingV View Post
b. i'd be REALLY surprised if it gets folded around to reach 50% atts OTB.....even in the micros
wat? atts % is based on opportunities to steal, it's only an opportunity if it gets folded around
shuinthehouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 03:02 PM   #36
veteran
 
VDownSwingV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: on the dooterbus
Posts: 2,499
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuinthehouse View Post
wat? atts % is based on opportunities to steal, it's only an opportunity if it gets folded around
obv i'm not paying attention
VDownSwingV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 03:55 AM   #37
veteran
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,952
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

at .25-.50 and .5-1., i don't think a flop cbet percentage over 90 percent can be optimally profitable. There will be a lot of multi-way peels and you're just donating to a pot in which you don't fair well equity wise.

Also, at .25-.50, it's hard to get your 3-betting percentage in the 10-12% range because of so many limped pots.
JQPublic777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 04:20 AM   #38
centurion
 
1peterdragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 104
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)



Small sample .25/50 fr

running hot i know

Last edited by 1peterdragon; 04-09-2010 at 04:28 AM.
1peterdragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 04:25 AM   #39
veteran
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,952
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

1Pdragon, what's ur hourly at FR? I think i'm about to make the conversion.
JQPublic777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 04:26 AM   #40
centurion
 
1peterdragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 104
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Distajo View Post
1Pdragon, what's ur hourly at FR? I think i'm about to make the conversion.
I'm not sure. Not worth it imo

STAY AWAY PLSE
1peterdragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 04:33 AM   #41
veteran
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,952
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

it's gotta be over 10/hr b/c you're always up high on the PTR's "top winner list" for our stakes.
JQPublic777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 04:34 AM   #42
centurion
 
1peterdragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 104
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Distajo View Post
it's gotta be over 10/hr b/c you're always up high on the PTR's "top winner list" for our stakes.
i put in around 85-100 hrs a month
1peterdragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 04:42 AM   #43
journeyman
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 371
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Distajo View Post
Also, at .25-.50, it's hard to get your 3-betting percentage in the 10-12% range because of so many limped pots.
As with ATS, your 3!% is based on your opportunities to 3!, so this doesn't make any difference.

Passive villains will lower your 3!% though -- if your average villain only raises his top 5% your 3! range will tighten up as well. I think we see a similar trend with FBBtS -- when most "steals" are actually value raises we have to defend less.

I think Dragon's ATS% suffers from the opposite. When the blinds are loose and more likely to call we should probably back off the stealing a bit and look for value raises instead.
NigelSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 05:01 AM   #44
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
dragon1893's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 11,055
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Distajo View Post
1Pdragon, what's ur hourly at FR? I think i'm about to make the conversion.
yesterday i played 400 hands of huhu, 150 of 6max. I just couldn't find a profitable fr game, otherwise i would also play it.

do you see where i'm getting at?
dragon1893 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 09:54 AM   #45
newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sugarmamma's house
Posts: 33
Re: OFFICIAL MicroStakesLIMIT stats thread (part 2)

I think I got some of my issues resolved, but apparently I still have opened up enough.I'm really trying to get to about 19/13ish but I'm just a nit at heart.As aside note,it seemed I ran pretty poor over these last 2 days.

Like always your feedback is appreciated
[IMG][/IMG]

If I didn't fold the small pairs in early position,and folding KQo to a early raiser....I think that would get me closer to my goal of 19/13.But I think both spots are leaky if I add them in,any thoughts wise peoples.

Last edited by ontiltagain; 04-09-2010 at 10:04 AM.
ontiltagain is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive