Going a little off-track here but MisterBunny did a Cardrunners vid all about responding to flop donks. He advocates raising frequently. The key factors he considers are the person's flop donk and flop/turn check-raising stats. The point is that donkers who have high flop or turn c-r ranges are weak when they donk.

My point was that against a random unknown who is donking a flop, I don't really care if my value/peeling ranges are balanced on a flop like this. Even against a player who I know is good, I'll have plenty of value hands that are calling this flop that I don't need to call with a monster like this.

So you're making this play for information? I don't think it's particularly difficult to guess what hands villain donked with if he folds at some point during the hand. If he folds the turn, likely it was a pure bluff or something like middle pair. If he folds the river, looks like a diamond draw. Either way I doubt the information you gain is worth the equity you're giving up by playing it passively, but I could be wrong on that.

You mentioned you'd call the flop and raise this safe turn.... are there any turn cards you're not raising here? I'm guessing a jack, anything else?

Basically, we shouldn't take an exploitative line until and unless we know which mistake we are trying to exploit.

This might be right at high stakes, but in the micros, I'm not sure it is. You aren't going to have information about a lot of your opponents, and there are pretty standard, unbalanced, exploitative lines (such as always putting in at least one re-raise or delayed raise with TPTK or an overpair) that are almost surely +EV against unknowns in the micros.