|
|
| Micro Stakes Limit Discussions of micro stakes limit Texas Hold'em |
02-08-2012, 01:21 AM
|
#1
|
|
newbie
Join Date: May 2011
Location: valuetown
Posts: 40
|
Dealing with a pair of 3!s
Villain is 28/22 w/ a 9% 3bet over 200 hands. Not enough hand to continue against this range (preflop and flop 3!s) right?
Merge - $0.50/$1 - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3
BTN: $27.95
SB: $53.98
BB: $20.42
UTG: $58.63
Hero (MP): $45.99
CO: $22.20
SB posts SB $0.25, BB posts BB $0.50
Pre Flop: ($0.75) Hero has J  K
fold, Hero raises to $1.00, CO raises to $1.50, fold, fold, fold, Hero calls $0.50
Flop: ($3.75, 2 players) T  8  J
Hero checks, CO bets $0.50, Hero raises to $1.00, CO raises to $1.50, Hero calls $0.50
Turn: ($6.75, 2 players) A
Hero checks, CO bets $1.00, Hero?
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 02:41 AM
|
#2
|
|
Won ****ty undertitle in BBB's Beanament
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,555
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
The pre-flop stats only tell part of the story.
You should also take into account post-flop tendencies when gauging whether to continue. Without knowing post-flop tendencies, you won't have as many tools at your disposal to take advantage of the other player.
Barring any post-flop read, if you think { 99, QJ-JT } are in his pre-flop and flop range, then I am pretty sure you have a call.
Last edited by anfernee; 02-08-2012 at 02:53 AM.
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 04:01 AM
|
#3
|
|
adept
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,047
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
after 200 hands you should have seen at least a couple of his 3bets to have a better idea on his range... (at least filter your stats and pretend you took the notes
but anyways.... I'd put 88+ in his range, I wouldn't put JT in his 3b range - maybe JTs (but we're behind to that too)
you only beat 99 and QJs
if you are behind only 4 Q outs are "mostly" clean
maybe discount to 3.5 outs...
(...you should probably do some combo counts here.... )
your getting 8.75:2 to call down ui
www.pokerstrategy.com
Board: TdJh8cAc
Equity Win Tie
MP3 25.26% 23.21% 2.06% { KsJd }
CO 74.74% 72.68% 2.06% { 88+, AJs, KJs+, QJs, AJo }
your actually pretty close odds-to-equity - but I'm gonna take a stab and say your combo counts are ugly - I'd probly fold
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 04:07 AM
|
#4
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: elsewhere
Posts: 1,855
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
Shouldn't we discount 99 a bit after the flop 3-bet?
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 04:15 AM
|
#5
|
|
adept
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,047
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
depends on what he thinks we are opening with - if we're opening down to 66 or 55, then it's an easy 3b - especially if the blinds are tight...
Edit: from villains pov
www.pokerstrategy.com
Equity Win Tie
MP3 48.43% 47.95% 0.48% { 55+, A7s+, K8s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T8s+, 98s, A8o+, KTo+, QJo }
CO 51.57% 51.09% 0.48% { 88 }
Last edited by augwest; 02-08-2012 at 04:21 AM.
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 05:57 AM
|
#6
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 10,886
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
easy turn call, decide on the river
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ampelmann
Shouldn't we discount 99 a bit after the flop 3-bet?
|
super standard 3! w 99, play more fishmax ampeldude
Last edited by dragon1893; 02-08-2012 at 06:03 AM.
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 07:00 AM
|
#7
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: BCAK
Posts: 356
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
Quote:
Originally Posted by dragon1893
super standard 3! w 99, play more fishmax ampeldude
|
I disagree. I agree that it could be in his range but I disagree that it shouldn't be discounted. It should be. Barring reads I cut out at least 50% of the 99 combos.
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 07:16 AM
|
#8
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 10,886
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grromit
I disagree. I agree that it could be in his range but I disagree that it shouldn't be discounted. It should be. Barring reads I cut out at least 50% of the 99 combos.
|
i was commenting on preflop...
on the flop, maybe he has 99
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 07:25 AM
|
#9
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: BCAK
Posts: 356
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
oic. I thought you were responding to the part you quoted...
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 08:07 AM
|
#10
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: elsewhere
Posts: 1,855
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
Quote:
Originally Posted by dragon1893
i was commenting on preflop...
on the flop, maybe he has 99
|
I wasn't talking about preflop. This is a very easy 3-bet against almost all opponents in FR as well, preflop. I was talking about the flop.
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 12:35 PM
|
#11
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fighting for my right to play poker
Posts: 3,450
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
call and see what the river brings.....
Do we all love c/r'ing the flop? As I read the hand I felt like just going into WA/WB mode. Not sure if that is right, but I block one of his overcards and don't mind letting a 6outer barrel...of course that plan was shot to death on the turn anyways
I get the C/R, but dread getting 3!'d here....seems kind of thinnish
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 01:00 PM
|
#12
|
|
newbie
Join Date: May 2011
Location: valuetown
Posts: 40
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
Quote:
Originally Posted by augwest
after 200 hands you should have seen at least a couple of his 3bets to have a better idea on his range... (at least filter your stats and pretend you took the notes 
|
I didnt have any notes! I usually take that as pretty straightforward...
Quote:
Originally Posted by augwest
but anyways.... I'd put 88+ in his range, I wouldn't put JT in his 3b range - maybe JTs (but we're behind to that too)
you only beat 99 and QJs
if you are behind only 4 Q outs are "mostly" clean
maybe discount to 3.5 outs...
(...you should probably do some combo counts here.... )
|
well, when I stoved 9% I had 99, ATs, and KTs as hands I beat. (and I guess if he 3! QTs then that too). But I didn't have a note about those (2nd pair hands) being in his flop 3! range...
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 01:49 PM
|
#13
|
|
newbie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: About 1 A.U. from the Sun
Posts: 42
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
*g* If villain is 28/22 and is at CO, you are behind to 88, TT, KQ, Ax, etc.. Do you have enough outs to make it worth calling? Pot odds are something like 6:1.. I think you have something like 5 outs? (2 J's, 3 K's) Although if he has 88, TT, then the K's don't help you.
I would probably fold.. what am I missing in the analysis?
Last edited by blueearth; 02-08-2012 at 01:51 PM.
Reason: took out quoted post
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 02:00 PM
|
#14
|
|
adept
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Our puppy Cali!
Posts: 1,084
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
*g*
Villain didn't blink when A fell, have 4 outs and some dirty J/K outs getting 8:1 seems like a call and fold unimproved.
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 02:03 PM
|
#15
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: BCAK
Posts: 356
|
Re: Dealing with a pair of 3!s
A couple of thoughts:
- If he's a thinking, positionally aware player he would 3bet significantly more than 9% against your CO open since the 9% is his total 3bet percentage
- The note you're really looking for is if he uses the call flop, raise turn line with TP+ (or overpairs+)
- Some players bet/3bet the flop with AK/AQ/KQ. For that reason the turn A could be bad. In fact, it's the worst card in the deck then. (Otherwise it would only improve AT and AA as you were already behind AJ. In fact, against AJ the A just improved you from 3 outs to 4 outs.)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.
|