Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread

08-05-2011 , 07:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michaelson
Yeah, but putting down 1-3 letters for 10 points and a ****ty rack is often not as valuable as paying 10 points for the potential to get some good letters to play with.
You could be right.

But how many tiles are you swapping? More than 3? I also don't swap to block the opponent w/ my ****ty 10pt. word.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 08:55 AM
Surely we can do better than "assume someone always has it." We need to do some range merging, possibly double and triple range merging.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 09:21 AM
assume they never have it

gamblers at heart
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 10:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JL514
assume they never have it

gamblers at heart
+1

when i risk it my internal monologue is actually "gambol gambol"
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 11:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaliceUW
I gave up on WWF because too many people cheat, then I call them out on it and it becomes awkward
yeah this is pretty common among all games that simulators are better than most or all humans. backgammon, chess, scrabble etc. thank god poker isn't at that point.

to find out the best play in WWF, quackle should work. its the best scrabble sim out there. i don't have a copy on this computer, but iirc the board and bonus squares are custom. i don't remember if you can change tile values and using all your tiles bonus. regardless it's much better than those anagram solver things because it factors in optimal strategy as well.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 11:55 AM
there's a WWF specific site where you can just plug in the whole board as you play. i checked it out once when i was doing investigative work on one of my opponents.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 12:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeti
there's a WWF specific site where you can just plug in the whole board as you play. i checked it out once when i was doing investigative work on one of my opponents.
I did some poking around, and you probably mean this http://www.lexicalwordfinder.com/

that will be enough to beat the vast majority of players, but it seems like it doesn't produce the best plays, just the highest scoring one
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeti
there's a WWF specific site where you can just plug in the whole board as you play. i checked it out once when i was doing investigative work on one of my opponents.
Yeah, somebody linked a few of them in the LC thread. I can't imagine taking the time to enter in my whole board for each of the ~15 games I'm playing, though. Though now that WWF has a FB app I imagine somebody will make a Chrome plugin that automatically pulls the board from that and officially ruin the game.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 12:33 PM
i meant this but obviously there are a ton :

http://www.scrabulizer.com/
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 12:53 PM
ooh that one is much much better. i'd hazard a guess that taking the top value (not points) from that simulator would beat all but ~100 humans.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keepitreal
do you prefer checkers to chess as well?

jk but not really.

i play it but it's a kids game!
If it is a kid's game then why is the loser executed in boiling lava !? You must be one sick individual !
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 06:16 PM
My friend got grimmstarr'd just now by his girlfriend. He started the game with a bingo and she declined the game.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 07:20 PM
So bad when they are giving you TWs and you can't bomb it due to rack misfortunes.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-05-2011 , 07:57 PM
I'm finding I remember quite a few junky 3 and 4 letter words from playing weboggle.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-06-2011 , 02:52 PM
ok, since nobody stepped up to challenge me except Yeti, i guess i have to challenge you guys. who wants some? (sooted72)
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-06-2011 , 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm13
yeah this is pretty common among all games that simulators are better than most or all humans. backgammon, chess, scrabble etc. thank god poker isn't at that point.

to find out the best play in WWF, quackle should work. its the best scrabble sim out there. i don't have a copy on this computer, but iirc the board and bonus squares are custom. i don't remember if you can change tile values and using all your tiles bonus. regardless it's much better than those anagram solver things because it factors in optimal strategy as well.
i hooked up quackle on my pc as a tool to do this and then found out that you couldnt change the # or pt value of the tiles. fail.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-06-2011 , 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaliceUW
I gave up on WWF because too many people cheat, then I call them out on it and it becomes awkward
i have a particular friend who does this to me. he was playing 4 letter words like KITE one day and then all of a sudden out of nowhere he developed the uncanny ability to play the longest word on his rack every single turn. he sucks at strategy so i still beat him most of the time, but its really frustrating to lose to someone who does that ****, especially when they blow open a close game with some bizarre bingo that even the best scrabble players probably dont know.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-06-2011 , 03:25 PM
Im rubbish, ill play someone who doesnt cheat

panicstation

say FOOT in chat
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-06-2011 , 03:58 PM
Fun ending here. I'm up 322-315, have a Q left. Praying he doesn't use anything to do with the I in RICE.

Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-06-2011 , 04:40 PM
freeee

he went "code", i went out with "qi".
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-06-2011 , 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyenimator
Fun ending here. I'm up 322-315, have a Q left. Praying he doesn't use anything to do with the I in RICE.

how the hell no one made TAJ (or RAJ) / AN for TWS is beyond me
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-06-2011 , 09:12 PM
lol yeah big fail there

I'm pretty bad, but it's a lot of fun anyway, maybe because the people I play are similarly skilled

anyone wants a game(plz no cheating lol) i'm bottomset on this
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-06-2011 , 09:45 PM
Odds are that the original placement of the J is much worse than the fact it wasn't tied to the triple word square imo.
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote
08-07-2011 , 01:38 AM
I'm noobydoo if anyone wants to play. Is averaging low 300's any good in this?? Some of the people I play with are pretty bad though...
Scramble with Friends (SWF) - Containment /Strat Thread Quote

      
m