Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
A moderation discussion thread A moderation discussion thread

04-21-2015 , 01:05 PM
didn't ptu get wookied?
04-21-2015 , 01:09 PM
Yeah he's banned already. I heard it was from politarding but don't know for sure. Sounds about right.
04-21-2015 , 02:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakmelk
Now I've grown to like thechefs posting as long as its not about bananas or steaks but he seems like a great example of someone who could have used a 'stop sucking' 1day temp when he just started here.

Thechef, Im not sure a lot of people/anyone wants or wanted you banned, what you describe sounds a lot like the shaming-to-post better routine.
Whenever I see this routine, I always think less of the ones performing it rather than those subject to it. It's extremely tedious and I doubt it works particularly well. We can use me as an example if you like. I have been subject to this "routine" but I haven't changed my behaviour because of it. It is just that you agree with some of my posts and disagree with others. You decide to call them "good posts" and "bad posts" and by doing this, you are implying that you are the voice of reason. Anybody who tries to elevate themselves to this status is automatically disqualified from the position in my book.

Besides that, I don't think it's as measured as you make it out to be. I think it's more likely that people either enjoy behaving like I described or can't help it.
04-21-2015 , 02:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Treesong
Well, hold on. There's a difference between calling out posters for being crappy (I do this, and fairly often) and arguing that crappy posters should be banned. I don't advocate banning any of you all, even though Custer should be destroyed. With respect to you personally, I will say that your responses to my posts have been perfectly reasonable, and we have disagreed without hostility. The fact that your positions are unsupportable and perhaps insane is entirely beside the point.
I don't advocate banning you or any of the other tedious lot either, for what it is worth.
04-21-2015 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thechef
I don't advocate banning you or any of the other tedious lot either, for what it is worth.
How about us non-tedious posters? Should we be banned?

I'm working on being less tedious, but it requires more effort than I'm willing to give...
04-21-2015 , 03:12 PM
If the chef thinks OOT has delicate sensibilities he must be an exceptionally ****ty person.
04-21-2015 , 03:21 PM
It's thechef that has delicate sensibilities. He can't even admit to himself that he's a thief.
04-21-2015 , 04:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonely_but_rich
If the chef thinks OOT has delicate sensibilities he must be an exceptionally ****ty person.
I was talking about a small number of posters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
It's thechef that has delicate sensibilities. He can't even admit to himself that he's a thief.
I'm not offended that you say it. You're just wrong is all.
04-21-2015 , 08:35 PM
27, I have faith you'll get there eventually. I haven't given up on you yet. One day this will be you:




But until that day, there's no shame in asking Rapini for help.
04-21-2015 , 09:36 PM
OK mods, how about TooRareToDie and whatever idiot he is arguing with in the "Our Generation" thread?
04-21-2015 , 10:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chopstick
27, I have faith you'll get there eventually. I haven't given up on you yet. One day this will be you:




But until that day, there's no shame in asking Rapini for help.

i'm getting there buddy. let me know when you think that day has come.

i mean, obviously not now because you are banned, but some other time when maybe you aren't banned.
04-21-2015 , 10:24 PM
Are you seriously ****ing with one of the best posters in OOT?

Chopsticks thread is like top 5 in OOT.
04-21-2015 , 10:27 PM
Pretty sure only reason 27 bans anyone is for criticizing him.
04-21-2015 , 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
It's amusing not merely because it happened but because it's typical hypocrisy from him. He says that he thinks the correct way to mod is being hands off
Lol, this.
04-21-2015 , 10:29 PM
Ban reason: belittling a mod in their home forum

Jesus. You'd be all over Rapini's case if he did this.
04-21-2015 , 10:33 PM
what's with you and rapini posting mod notes here? AWAY WITH YOU!
04-21-2015 , 10:34 PM
A plague on both our houses!
04-21-2015 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
Are you seriously ****ing with one of the best posters in OOT?
Quite the contrary. I warned him he was on thin ice and he posted a huggies commercial as a reply and said I'd get there eventually. Well I'm here bitch.


NEXT!
04-21-2015 , 10:43 PM
hahahaha 'best posters in oot"

04-21-2015 , 10:45 PM
Soup Nazi might be best guest character on that show. You want bread? THREE DOLLARS!
04-21-2015 , 11:41 PM
Man, 27, you're a horrible mod.
04-21-2015 , 11:52 PM
The irony is 27 pretty much just showed how he takes traits from all 3 mods he ranked. Spite banned chopstick, can be a sociopath at times, and wants to shape OOT into his own image (although not nearly at Dids-level).

Well done.
04-22-2015 , 12:16 AM
the first two sure, the last one not at all. gregorio was also very astute.
04-22-2015 , 12:21 AM
Disgruntled posters start thread complaining about B&M modding

27 offsuit tells Rapini and Lattimer they should follow his hands off approach from OOT

Disgruntled OOT posters say 27 should mod more like Rapini and Lattimer

27 abandons hands off approach and bans critics

??????

Irony
04-22-2015 , 12:24 AM
Literally none of those statements are accurate but hey

      
m