This is pretty much an exact description of this chick (Donald Trump is an example of the counterpart, the "grandiose narcissist"):
Quote:
Vulnerable narcissists (VNs) tend to be more emotionally sensitive. They feel helpless, anxious and victimized when people don't treat them like royalty. Just like those with BPD, vulnerable narcissists are preoccupied with fears of rejection and abandonment. They swing back and forth between feeling superior and inferior depending on what's going on in their life at the moment. A setback (such as being fired or threatened with divorce) can bring them to therapy. But when the crisis is over, they drop out.
VN's appear to be over-compensating for low self-esteem and a deep-seated sense of shame that may date back to early childhood. They developed the behaviors as a coping mechanism to deal with neglect, abuse or a dismissive style of parent-child attachment (meaning the parents never developed a close bond with their child, so he never felt safe and secure in his parents' love).
As adults, VNs care about how their partners see them and try to get respect. But ironically, they get defensive at suggestions that they change. They may have hidden affairs, yet accuse the other partner of being unfaithful and obsess about preventing that from happening.
The reason I post this is that I really wonder whether by posting the GFM, she is sort of engineering a "test" of her friends. I once vaguely knew a guy who was a total failure at all things female and whenever he met women, within 5 mins he would be complaining about being a virgin and how women hated him etc. Needless to say this was like spraying capsicum spray in the face of nearby females. This was then a cathartic confirmation of his own failure. I think this catharsis is common when people have deep seated fears, it's like your tongue constantly going to the gap where a tooth should be, people derive a weird satisfaction from confirming that there is something wrong with them. So I think subconsciously she's setting up a situation where people are either confirmed as Real Friends via giving money (yay!) or they're confirmed as Disloyal *******s (also yay, in this weird cathartic way).
Edit: The point here is that even were I narcissistic enough to think I deserve money because a bad thing happened to me, my immediate worry would be that I was subjecting my friends to an impossible choice between shelling out money and ignoring me appealing to them. Of course the level 0 interpretation is just that she doesn't give the slightest **** what she puts her friends through and just wants the $$$, but I don't think I buy that. I think on a subconscious level, she WANTS to subject her friends to a loyalty test. The uncertainty of not knowing whether her friends are Truly Loyal or not is agonizing. It's like Trump and his Loyalty Pledges.
That's probably too serious for this thread lol, but I think it's some interesting psychology.