Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctorZangief
The point of that facetious example is that the 17/20 scenario is just some masturbatory unicorn that dudes pretend is the norm case for stat rape so that they can make hacky D+ jokes. It's HURRRR DURR mental masturbation for privileged people to pretend they're tackling some sort of strenuous moral exercise instead of admitting it's just to share terrible open mic material while sporting a half chub.
I'm not offended by the topic I'm offended by the bad comedy. This is like every Jezebel blogger's wet dream: just a bunch of douchey dudes casually and lazily making terrible rape jokes that don't move the chains of comedy at alllll. Did anyone have any doubt that South Park would be referenced in the first three posts?! Haaaaacks. HAAAAAaacks.
Stat rapists are gross. Some gross people don't look gross. A sliver of gross people might look conventionally attractive. The vast majority of survivors of sexual assault get seriously ****ed up. A tiny sliver of them, despite getting violated, may not. Stat rapists are in no way capable of discerning who may get seriously ****ed up by their grossness.
Stop pretending this is some common scenario just for the terrible jokes. You are not Norton vs West.
lol wtf are u smoking?
did you even read any of the links?
one had 52 different cases listed of teacher/student affairs n 99% of them were hot chicks in their 20s with 17-18 yr old dudes.
lmao at classifying that as abuse.
there are ****ing 17/18yr olds dying in ****ing combat but ya lets all get worked up about some of them experiencing what will most likely be some of the hottest sex of their lives.
on a totally unrelated note, when I was in 7th n 8th grade I had the hottest teacher ever.
to this day she is one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen IRL.
we all had the biggest crush on her.
sadly she never abused me.
however when I was 14 I did have a sexual encounter with a women in her early 20s, and while we didn't actually consummate the relationship, it was steamy hot and I jerked off to that memory countless times.
let's not pretend that women in their early 20s attracted to 17/18yr old kids (and jfc have u seen some of the HS athletes they look more ****ing masculine than I do ffs) is remotely the same as someone attracted to a pre pubescent 12yr old.
there is a MASSIVE difference.
doctorZ u are seriously out of touch with reality, but I suppose if u have to be so delusional it's better than ur on the anti child sex side of the fence.