Quote:
Originally Posted by JL514
There is only one reason I can think of that BT would help your score, and that's if you moved say 4k balance from a card with a 5k limit to a card with a 10k limit or similar, reducing your utilization.
The scenario you describe is only worthwhile if it's going to take you a long time to pay the debts down. Otherwise, you're paying 3% and moving $8k, so you're paying $240 instantly for the privilege of having interest not accrue for x months. Additionally, your scenario is bad - you don't want to have cards "filled up" as it murders your local utilization and you look like a high risk client to those banks.
I'm confused by these two points.
In the first paragraph, I have $4k in debt across two cards with $15k total credit limit. Does it really matter whether I have the whole $4k on the lower limit card, $2k on each card, or the whole $4k on the higher limit card? My overall utilization is the same.
In the second paragraph, you mention "local utilization". I've never seen this term mentioned anywhere else. Is that a thing?
As for whether a balance transfer is worthwhile to begin with, I asked a lot of questions from the CC card company about the transfer, and it seemed to me to make sense for my situation. I asked how payments are applied and they said any amount up to the minimum payment gets applied to the transferred balance, with any amount over the minimum getting applied to my main balance. My new minimum payment over the term of the 0% APR period would basically clear out the amount of the transfer. Any remaining amount of the transfer would then be subject to to my regular APR, but that is slightly lower than the APR from the cards I am transferring the balance from. Finally, the amount of the transfer fee is lower than the total of the monthly interest I would have accrued over the period of the 0% APR.
That all seems to make it a good idea for me to do it. Am I missing something?