Quote:
Originally Posted by Otty_Botty
An architect designs, (only top design draftsmen design)
|
Not legally, in many places, except for projects below certain thresholds. Can't design unless you are an architect or registered designer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otty_Botty
An architect doesn't understand the engineering behind the building. Thats what the engineers for.
|
LOL, so true.
Whereas the engineer doesn't understand aesthetics, functional programming, zoning, contract administration, building codes, space optimization, client relations, form/function tradeoffs, project management, environmental impacts on design and design impacts on the environment, ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otty_Botty
Basically say a client wants a new house. The client goes to an architect and says, "Design me a house on this block."
Architect does this, then the client or architect hands off these plans to an engineer so that he can actually detail design everything in the house.
|
Not really. Just the structural, mechnical and electrical components.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otty_Botty
Once the engineer knows whats going on he will hand this info onto me to draw it up into something that could be built.
|
Do your engineers still have a steno pool to type their memos on IBM Selectrics and bring them coffee? (A lot of engineers do their own AutoCAD.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otty_Botty
Then we send that to a detail draftsman who will list every single item that needs to be made including lengths, sizes, numbers etc right down to individual bolts.
|
Up here the computer takes off a bill of materials from the drawings automatically.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otty_Botty
These plans are then sent to the builder to be built.
|
You forgot the part where the plans are sent back to the architect to be checked, sent back to the engineer to be corrected and then sent back to the architect to be approved before being issued.
An engineer is to an architect as you describe a draftsman being to an engineer.