I would like to know your thinking on this. If you don't want to answer just say that instead of being a ****ing baby and trying to avoid the question.

And the point of all this is that there isn't any proof that anything they found with luminol other than the Rudy print is actually connected to the murder. And there is no proof any of the luminol hits are blood because luminol is juat a presumptive test.

Listen, its a simple question. Henry would probably say 100%, I'd probably say 98%, what would you say?

I mean even if they didn't test it at all, surely there would still be a non-zero chance they were blood.

Edit: It honestly started as a random/curious question, I don't think its a gotcha type question at all. It seems to me very reasonable to ask people in a debate like this how confident they are in their positions.

The one that is obviously blood is blood.

The barefoot prints are negative for DNA and tested negative for blood with TMB. They're also nearby Rudy's shoeprints.

If you want to talk about percentages how likely do you think it is that Raf and Amanda holding Meredith down and helping to knife her to death and then moving her body resulted in no forensic traces. Add to that Guede has his shoeprints and his palmprint on the pillow found beneath her and his footprints are by her bed and go out the door. Add to that many of these luminol hits are in the same hallway he left these bloody prints in.

What perecentage do you give it that AK and RS were able to clean every single footprint and genetic trace in the murder room to the point that luminol was negative for them in the whole room and also able to clean every single bit of DNA from the hallway while cleaning around Guede's shoeprints?

It's not a simple question because all of the hits are not equal and tested for different things and were attributable to different people or no one at all like one of the footprints in Amanda's room. What I'm looking for in this case and have been since the very beginning is some type of evidence that you can't argue away that points to their guilt.

This isn't it.

Also Amanda took a freakin shower there the next morning and walked through that. Consider that if she is innocent there is still a decent chance she could have walked through blood or dilute blood in her travels in the cottage that day.

What I'm looking for is direct evidence they did the deed. Scott Peterson has the motive, opportunity, means, and the circumstantial evidence pointed to him. OJ had cuts on his hands and blood at the scene. The victims' blood was mixed together with his in his car and house. There is that kind of evidence in this case but it all points to Guede.

\

Also, one other thing. I don't know the answer to this question honestly. I'm not sure Stefanoni said why they didn't do confirmatory testing. However in the Independent Expert DNA report regarding the knife blade I found this. That was a pretty damn small sample as far as I know. Not sure if that means anything.

ETA for clarity the "species specific" test is the confirmatory test.

Rudy is a confirmed "non-flusher" and apparently all sides agree to this. There's nothing weird about him not flushing here (by his standards obv) other than him not thinking about the fact that he was leaving evidence behind, but he immediately fled so his opinion was probably already that they'd know it was him. But the fact that he didn't flush is (apparently) not considered odd by either side.

I should have known you would only address my question by trying to change the subject. I'll go back to ignoring you then.

Im shocked you dont want to answer meaningless questions like that. I answered your question and gave you more information than younasked for. Youre welcome.

for CENSORED sake 239 hes talking about the prints from amandas room to filo's room. the ones the defense said were juice.

what % do you say they are blood?

please answer in a way where we can control-F for "%" and find your answer.

just want to see exactly how deluded you are

Rudy was known to not flush.

who is it that testified/confirmed he doesnt flush? can someone link me to a source if possible?

The dump has to be before the killing. After the killing Rudy's footprints go straight to the door and any scenario where he cleans his feet to walk around and then returns to the body to get them nice and bloody again before freaking out and running out the door are too unbelievable.

We don't know how long Rudy, Amanda, and Raf were in the cottage. The best explanation is that Rudy went to the toilet before anything happened. Rudy's statements have always had an underlying message of I was involved but I never thought she'd end up dead.

The better question is why didn't Amanda flush? The **** had been in that toilet for 12 hours and she admits that she saw it. She knows the girls who use that bathroom will not be home for another day and a half at least but she proceeds to do her hair in the bathroom and not flush. I have no experience but I'd expect the bathroom would start to be unpleasant smelling at this point so why not flush?

His DNA was on the toilet paper so I have no go with he cleaned himself although no pictures of the actual inside of the toilet are available.