Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
I made my stance clear in the rules and am standing by it.
You said law enforcement, spies and military personnel. Baghdadi is clearly not the first two and the third is debatable at best. His background is in religious studies, not military operations, and he was elected to his current role by a religious committee. He's in charge of a group that wages war, but so are many other dictators, war criminals, drug lords, etc. Furthermore, I specifically asked you about eligibility issues in my PM, which you said people could do in the OP. Baghdadi should be in and there is no reading of your OP where it's clear and definitive what your posture would be regarding someone like Baghdadi.