Cos we're bored ?

I wonder at what level one can find a steady flow of soft tables, play ABC poker, and make $100/hr. At a 40 hr work week and 50 weeks a year, that's $200,000 a year.

Two full weeks a year, thank you boss!

The trouble is that technically it isn't really that hard ... my estimate is +50$/hr multitabling 100NL .. and that estimate isn't anything stellar or unreachable.

The problem is that very few people can stand not attempting to move up, cos the grind is excrutiatingly boring and the solitude is not easily negligeble .. despite the good money, it ****s you up severely .. also once ****ed up, reality shifts and your game can deteriate.

But other than that there have been +200k yearly graphs in BBV from 100NL FR grinders every year, it doesn't get anymore abc than grinding 24 tables of 100NL FR.

LOL I don't work for anyone. If your seriously not trolling these guys and you don't grasp what they are trying to tell you then this book will be useless to you.

OK just wondered. Sometimes people get caught up in the heat of battle and don't realize they're blatantly being trolled or dealing with a retard and logic and reason doesn't appeal to them. Have fun I guess.

You're just wumming and name-calling.Pathetic.I'm not wasting any more time with you.

Okay guys. I'm ending this as it is getting a bit out of hand.

My thoughts on this are as follows...
I think e-books are a good source of information. I also think some of these e-books (more lately it seems) are written by some pretty good to excellent players. So I believe they are +EV and have value. Whether or not the player has been winning is of little consequence. It does not take a great player to be a great teacher. They are not the same. I'll admit that being a winning player adds credibility and may even edge them towards being more likely to be a good teacher. But it does not mean is that an average player couldn't be a great teacher.

I have often looked at the 100+ poker books on my shelf and thought, "Wow. These were a fantastic deal." Some of these books could have cost $1000.00 and still helped to make me a profit. The high prices of some of these e-books may seem like they are way too high. In reality they might be priced too low. I think it depends on the perspective. From an average consumers perception, they are way to expensive. Other books go for around $25. From the authors perception, the book is likely too cheap. The information that we would hope they are selling could be worth thousands, maybe millions. And without doubt, in the hands of the right person or people, it could make the author's living considerably more difficult. Now there are players out there armed with the same skills and know how the author plays. Doyle Brunson has been quoted that writing Super System resulted in him having to significantly change his game.

That being said...
I don't think it's wrong that Cwocwoc is looking for some evidence that the book is worth the price. Since the authors stats may not be the greatest and many people are defending the book, the author, etc; I don't think Cwocwoc is out of line by asking them for before and after stats. I also don't think any of the 2+2ers bing asked for this information are obligated to share their stats. If they do not wish to back up what they're saying with personal information; that's their choice. Not sharing the information doesn't make what they're saying any more true or less untrue.

I also think that no one should be saying it's not worth the price if they have not read it.

Cwocwoc,
I hope you find the information you're seeking. There's nothing wrong with making an informed decision on a big purchase. But please be respectful when seeking it. There are a large number of excellent players on 2+2. Most, if not all of them, would not be willing to share their stats. It does not mean they're a bad player or a less credible source of information. You'll know who the good players are based on the quality of their posts.

Hopefull this will put to rest the past two pages of garbage.

Well said.

In terms of the various authors' claims of success, yes I agree with the belief that they may be stretching it a little in terms of what will come from reading their material. But at the same time, I think for certain people who have the aptitude and desire to digest it all, learn from it, and then apply it correctly (no easy task), the claims might not be that far off the mark. But, obviously not everyone has the ability to do that. In fact, I also think the people who can, would likely eventually reach higher levels without the information in these books, but just at a slower pace. So, the books help accelerate process and thereby add value. Also, on the flip side of that is the reality that some people no matter how many books or ebooks they read, videos the watch, etc, they just won't make $$$. Now for everyone else somewhere in the middle, as expressed in this thread, different people look for and get different things out of these books. While input from others as to the worth of a book when making a purchase decision is nice, the end result is not what others got from it; but what you got from the book. If the person buying it thought they got their monies worth, or didn't, or got more, that's all that matters.

I personally don't get all these ebook threads where people are bashing them simply on cost. There are surely lots of things in this world that the cost vs. value is subjective. ebooks are just pokers version of that. If you've got the money and want to spend it, so be it.

Getting back to discussion on the book itself.
Do any of the guys (the people that have read it of course) think that his claim that buying the first part of the book will give a 25nl player enough background into micro stakes poker theory to turn that player into a 100nl reg, assuming the reader is relatively intelligent and willing to put the time in absorbing the knowledge within it?

Personnally, I can't really answer to this. Tough one.

Most of the information in that book is not all that unique: bet sizing, isolation, pot control. etc. You can find it in plenty of sources. I'm not sure why one who would improve from that book could not get the same material cheaper and in a more accessible manner.

For Easy Game I to be a real book, it would need to be heavily revised and rewritten. It isn't that the material is bad so much as that it isn't anything we haven't see before. There's a marketing point with these e-books that at a high price, one must be buying privileged secrets on how to crush the game. That isn't necessarily so.

Just remember that the original price of Supersystem, in inflation-adjusted dollars, was $297.98. At the time, it was the only book of its kind and Internet forums didn't exist. So it was one of the few sources of serious poker info.

Yeah but you are not paying for "a new and groundbreaking strategy to beat the micros" You pay to have a tons of concepts explained and organised together in a way that it's easier to digest/apply them. Obviously pretty much all this stuff can be found in videos and forums.. but not in the same video, thread and in the way BalugaWhale explain it. That's what you pay for.

There's only a handful of concepts. Most of them are readily discernible through observation and a little math. The rest is just application and discipline.