Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkthatflop
Hello,
I just started reading your book, and I have a question...
On chapter 2 about variance, on the first hand you show where you raise KK UTG+1 and the villan just flats from mid position, you c-bet the flop and he raises.
My question is, more times than not someone that flats MP has a pocket pair and that raise is really strong. I dont advocate an insta-fold, but I guess that he will have made the set a lot of times...
Am I thinking correctly?
Vs. a reg, it's def an insta-fold. Vs. a recreational player, I think shoving is fine - they will overplay top pair (as this one did) and other overpairs (99-QQ).
Quote:
Originally Posted by D1G1TALFOX
Great Job On Your Book "Building a Bankroll" almost done reading and just wanted to say I really enjoyed it.
Thank you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillianMates
Hey V,
I have one real question about today's games, do you think that zoom/rush games can be as profitable as the regular ones? My question comes from my own experience, my win rate is always much better at the regular tables, in them I always have a high game selection, starting most of my tables and playing lots of hands HU or really short handed.
It is clear that much oh the zoom/rush games advantage come from the really easy way of starting sessions, you also can take break whenever you want to. So in general, how you see those relationships? Do you beleve that now a days it is still better to build a bankroll from zoom/rush FR games?
No - I don't think zoom/rush are as profitable as regular tables because you cannot table select. On Stars, those games are also used by regs to put in a lot of easy volume. It's really all about your preference, but all else being equal, I can't see how regular tables won't be more profitable in terms of winrate.