Quote:
Originally Posted by yegor
wow such a massive fail
he played 2.5m hands at 2nl and 5nl and he's losing after 350k hands of 25nl
This is incorrect. I have publicly posted my results. As for your opinion on the amount of hands that I have played at the lowest stakes, I would think that that would actually be highly beneficial for a book largely aimed at these stakes no?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieHard
I would say they are pretty normal, just look at the other winners at 5NL it's just that noone else would play that many hands there lol. 2NL and 5NL you really dont need to know much about poker to beat them. I also would not try to "chrush" these nanostakes with a special strategy where you get in trouble at higher limits, rather try to improve your game at these stakes and prepare how to play good poker for the higher limits
You are of course welcome to your opinion but I think you are wrong. I think a lot of people actually do have trouble with these limits. Just because YOU apparently breezed through them doesn't mean that everyone else did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cpt.Hero
Any sane player will not play millions of Hands at nl2. They simply move up in stakes. So they wont have a big sample on nl2.
I am quite sane actually. Thanks for the compliment though! And I have played plenty of hands at much higher stakes. Again, I have publicly posted my results.
Quote:
Originally Posted by striiing
you da man
Thank you!
Last edited by BlackRain; 12-22-2011 at 04:08 AM.