Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvis
How many tables you play has nothing to do with how many buy ins you need. It's the risk of going broke just because of variance itself.
Also if you don't have a long record of beating 50PLO and just deposited 6 weeks ago I'd bet on you not being a profitable player. Focus on learning the game well before playing stakes that can bust your bankroll in a few days and you don't know you can beat yet.
Thanks, Kelvis. I'll keep that in mind. I certainly won't discount it. I do feel like I've put myself in good spots and review my big hands (winning and losing) regularly. I also feel like I have a good idea of where I'm at most of the time. I've done some study and continue to do so, but I don't think one can study enough.
Ive been a middle of the road NLHE player for years. Quit after Black Friday online, then went to live casual games only in between. Only recently have I got back online, and I've focused on PLO since.
Pre Black Friday, I played MTT, would cash if I wanted to buy something, or after a deep run in a big table. Never managed a cash bankroll before, hence the question. I'm really more interested in this smoker...I really feel like I can get there, so the challenge is as fun for me as anything else
.
Also, how could the number of table you play not effect the number of buyins necessary? If you're gambling more money, you need more of a roll, right? Or are you of the stance that's it's variance over a number of hands, multiple tables just levels you out quicker?
Last edited by BBQpoker; 06-13-2017 at 04:28 PM.
Reason: Additional question.