This is also what my stats have been at 25NL. I think i was like 20/17 with a little bit higher 3bet also.
I might try lagging it up a bit though, because most people at 25nl are playing this tight/abc style.
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
HI, I play NL10 for 10k hands for the most part is 6tabling but last 4 k hands is 10 table which I've found alot better allows me to almost not tilt and play dumb hands
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
errorleet, looks like you're playing rather weak-tight but are pretty good at calling down winning hands, which is just about the hardest way to play winning poker.
Preflop: 21/13 is not bad, but you're still limping/calling too much (I think I've said that 100 times in this thread now).
Postflop is really amazing though. Your aggression% is below 20% on all streets. You go to showdown more than any winning player I've ever seen. You win more hands at showdown than anyone I've ever seen. Your W$WSF is very low.
Do you ever bet when you have the best hand? Also you must be laying down tons of winners, and miss opportunities to bluff a guy out.
I'm frankly amazed you can win with this tight-passive approach.
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
ocnap: Wow. What is your range for playing a hand? It looks like 22+,AQ+ and nothing else.
Yes, you should definitely open up lots more in cutoff and button.
Think of it this way: When it's folded to you on the button, there are only two players left after you. You'll be having position postflop on both. If you have a hand like KJo (in the top 13%) or J9o (top 30%) or 54s, or any two cards, the odds that they'll fold if you raise. If they don't fold, you'll have position and the initiative postflop, and they'll often fold to a c-bet.
With your supertight style, full-ring maybe better suited for you.
My BB/100 has really gone down the drain here, I was just wondering what you guys can take from these stats and if you can find anything worth mentioning here. It's all 10NL.