|
|
| Beginners Questions Poker beginner ?
Ask your (possibly) naive question here and our community will attempt to help you. |
12-18-2008, 09:25 PM
|
#61
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Feeding the Fish
Posts: 2,314
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
What's IIRC mean?
|
If I Remember Correctly
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 09:33 PM
|
#62
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,326
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shick
If I Remember Correctly 
|
lol, oh. I think that's the last popular acronym here that I didn't know the meaning of so all taken care of now I think. And btw I posted my stats earlier in this thread so no need to recall, could have just scrolled up and looked.
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 09:36 PM
|
#63
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Feeding the Fish
Posts: 2,314
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
I can't keep track of what's in what thread, are you crazy?
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 09:46 PM
|
#64
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,326
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shick
I can't keep track of what's in what thread, are you crazy? 
|
Oh yea, true .... guess I let my mind get away from me a little there.
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 09:47 PM
|
#65
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Feeding the Fish
Posts: 2,314
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
Oh yea, true .... guess I let my mind get away from me a little there. 
|
I'm not CMAR, you know.
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 09:52 PM
|
#66
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,326
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shick
I'm not CMAR, you know.
|
Oh? Does CMAR have a good memory?
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 09:54 PM
|
#67
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Feeding the Fish
Posts: 2,314
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
Oh? Does CMAR have a good memory?

|
When it comes to the forums, he's the ****.
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 09:57 PM
|
#68
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,326
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shick
When it comes to the forums, he's the ****.
|
He's alright.
Nah, he's pretty good.
We're kinda clogging up this thread though. lol
|
|
|
12-24-2008, 03:09 PM
|
#69
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Anarchist for mod!
Posts: 45,000
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Alright I just completed 2nl and here are my results, what do you think?
Have I posted the right reports?
|
|
|
12-25-2008, 04:59 AM
|
#70
|
|
banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,008
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
2NL handles quite differently from 10 and 25NL becuase you're deep and players are so passive, so you limp a lot more, I would think. I think your focus should be br building and moving up. Anyway, here we go:
12BB/100 is pretty good, even for 2NL, so you're doing all right. I think it's time to move up from that stat alone.
As mentioned, this could be a result of being 200bb deep and be aginst loose oppoennts, but your PFR needs to be much closer to your VPIP. I also think you can play more hand profitably vs worse opponents, and as such I'd run something like 17/14, but an even tighter one should be what you are aiming for if you want to run a good TAG preflop game for higher levels. Your W$SD is fine, though could be a bit better, but in general the stats are quite fine.
Overall you seem to be quite positionally aware, which is good. SB can be tighter, though.
More stats like AF, Af%, 3bet/4bet, etc would be useful too.
You're ready to move up. Also, I recommend moving to 6Max instead. It's the place to be nowadays.
|
|
|
12-25-2008, 01:34 PM
|
#71
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Anarchist for mod!
Posts: 45,000
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Thanks for the input Ro. For the first half of the hands, when I'd get KT, TJ in late position, I would just limp, then after some discussion, I've started raising with them and notice the difference. The first 10k hands, I was probably around 20-25% V$PIP as well, thanks to some sweat sessions, my game greatly improved.
I have moved up to 5nl and I'm only going to stay there until my roll gets to 300, then I'm going to play 10nl. Other stats as requested. I'm curious why you recommend 6 max, higher winrate?
|
|
|
12-26-2008, 05:52 AM
|
#72
|
|
banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,008
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Higher winrate, definetly, also more tables. It's more profitable and also it gets you into more profitably marginal sitautions and improves you as a poker player. Even if you want to play FR mostly, being good at 6Max will help, just as playing HU helped my 6Max game tremendously.
|
|
|
12-30-2008, 12:36 PM
|
#73
|
|
adept
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 727
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Started playing cash games primarily over the last month or so after being a mainly SnG player. As I'd not played much in the way of cash games prior to this I wanted to work up from NL2 to whatever level decent BR management dictated. I was originally going to play 10k hands at each level below my current bankroll limits to make sure i could beat it before moving up. However i'm finding myself wanting to move up from 2NL after just under 5k hands. Would you recommend moving up to 5NL now and not bothering with 2NL (unless i drop a fair few BI's at 5NL) or would my original plan of playing at least 10k hands at each level be more advisable?
Anyway, these are my current stats at NL2. Oh and my BR is currently sat at $280
Thanks in advance
Edit: Also is it normal to be in profit in the blinds? I'm guessing the small sample size is the main reason for this
|
|
|
12-30-2008, 12:44 PM
|
#74
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Anarchist for mod!
Posts: 45,000
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chachava
However i'm finding myself wanting to move up from 2NL after just under 5k hands. Would you recommend moving up to 5NL now and not bothering with 2NL (unless i drop a fair few BI's at 5NL) or would my original plan of playing at least 10k hands at each level be more advisable?
Anyway, these are my current stats at NL2. Oh and my BR is currently sat at $280
Thanks in advance
Edit: Also is it normal to be in profit in the blinds? I'm guessing the small sample size is the main reason for this
|
10k hands isn't really a huge sample size. That being said, you seem to be doing ok at 2nl and you've played higher. However I'd caution that if you start taking shortcuts at 2nl, it creates the wrong habbits for later.
That being said, there isn't too much to learn at 2nl, so if you are going to play under you bankroll, maybe try doing this:
2nl 5k hands minimum + bankroll rules
5nl 10k hands minimum + bankroll rules
10nl 20k hands minimum + bankroll rules
25nl & up, you can either set 20k as your minimum or make your own minimum.
Currently my coach has me playing at least 35k hands at each limit, I find it a good medium considering I multi table and can play 20k hands in a good week.
|
|
|
12-30-2008, 01:00 PM
|
#75
|
|
adept
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 727
|
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **
I think my main problem is that i'm finding the profits coming a hell of a lot slower in cash games than they did in SnG's. I think i'll follow your suggestions on playing an increasing number of hands at each level. Sometimes takes me a while to get the volume in though because of other commitments and only playing 4 tables max. Think i'll play another hour or so of NL2 tonight then see how i get on with NL5 in the new year
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 AM.
|