Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions

Notices

Beginners Questions Poker beginner ? Ask your (possibly) naive question here and our community will attempt to help you.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-14-2008, 06:15 PM   #31
Pooh-Bah
 
checkmate36's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: This is not a gambling website
Posts: 5,100
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

I would think this would make a pretty good sticky. It would def be a good thread for new players looking to improve.
checkmate36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 10:38 PM   #32
journeyman
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 246
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

Hey guys,

Would you be able to analyze my stats? I multi-table 6.50 Turbo STT, about 4 at a time on poker stars.








sundevilfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 11:24 PM   #33
journeyman
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 246
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

ahhh u know what I just realized I only have 7K hands, I'll repost after 3000 more.
sundevilfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2008, 12:31 AM   #34
banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,008
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

SnGs are also more difficult to analye through stats as many other factors affect your decisions. As such, I suggest making a video of yourself playing a few tables with commentary or posting your hand histories (with pokerxfactor player).
RoSeeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2008, 02:44 PM   #35
banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 86
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

perhaps some food for thought and a little evidence against the common complaint that "nobody folds" at uNL full ring.



i regularly run at 100NL and 200NL FR while occasionally playing 6max (where ironically i am forced to tighten up).

played 5K hands at 25NL to teach a friend to that uNL full ring was playable as a seeming "reckless" LAG and wasnt "suicide". 5K hands is admittedly a small sample size, but many sessions i ran as high as 40/30 ostensibly exposing me to greater variance and more marginal spots than an average TAG running 20/18.

cliff:
-microstakes players do fold.
-ironically, easier to steal blinds relentlessly in FR than 6max.
pepito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2008, 01:37 PM   #36
adept
 
Slimtobi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: reppin' a missclick
Posts: 996
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

Quote:
-ironically, easier to steal blinds relentlessly in FR than 6max.
very ironic

btw, nice upswong there
Slimtobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2008, 03:41 PM   #37
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,326
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

Quote:
Originally Posted by pepito View Post
-ironically, easier to steal blinds relentlessly in FR than 6max.

Doesn't seem ironic to me. Seems logical.


You won't get as many chances to steal at full ring but when you do get a chance to steal you'll probably have a higher success rate because doesn't it make sense that people playing full ring will probably defend and 3bet less often than people playing 6max? It makes sense to me.
Lego05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2008, 06:31 PM   #38
banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 86
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

you conflated "successful steal attempt" with "attempt to steal %".

2P2 orthodoxy provides that FR preflop ranges should be tighter while 6max preflop ranges ought be looser. hence, the irony in such a seemingly ridiculous high attempt to steal blinds %. moreover, PT2 only counts open raises on the button and CO as steal attempts, so the stat does not include instances of attacking limpers from MP to the HJ.

try searching micro FR stat threads for any examples of players running 30/20 with an attempt to steal blind % as high as 64%. it is unlikely youll find many.
pepito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2008, 09:33 PM   #39
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,326
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

Quote:
Originally Posted by pepito View Post
-ironically, easier to steal blinds relentlessly in FR than 6max.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pepito View Post
you conflated "successful steal attempt" with "attempt to steal %".

2P2 orthodoxy provides that FR preflop ranges should be tighter while 6max preflop ranges ought be looser. hence, the irony in such a seemingly ridiculous high attempt to steal blinds %. moreover, PT2 only counts open raises on the button and CO as steal attempts, so the stat does not include instances of attacking limpers from MP to the HJ.

try searching micro FR stat threads for any examples of players running 30/20 with an attempt to steal blind % as high as 64%. it is unlikely youll find many.

Easier to steal the blinds implies success rate. There's no such thing as easier to attempt to steal. I could attempt to steal the blinds 100% if I wanted. If one says the blinds are easier to steal then another would expect him to be talking about a high success rate.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pepito View Post
2P2 orthodoxy provides that FR preflop ranges should be tighter while 6max preflop ranges ought be looser.
This is exactly why it is easier to steal at full ring. Sure you will probably get less attempts but the attempts you get will succeed at a higher rate because the players in the blinds will on average play a tighter range than players at 6max would ... meaning they will fold to your steal attempts more often.



If I played full ring with all the nits there I would imagine my ATS % would be very high since a lot of the players I'd be playing would likely be very tight ... and likely would fold their blinds. Of course I also imagine I would get many fewer opportunities.
Lego05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2008, 10:33 PM   #40
veteran
 
Shick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Feeding the Fish
Posts: 2,314
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05 View Post
If I played full ring with all the nits there I would imagine my ATS % would be very high since a lot of the players I'd be playing would likely be very tight ... and likely would fold their blinds. Of course I also imagine I would get many fewer opportunities.
IIRC, your ATTS% is pretty high already.
Shick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 12:23 AM   #41
stranger
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 9
Re: ** Official Beginners NL Holdem Stats Thread **

I have been playing several years off and on in the micros...grinding my first PP account up from $100 to $600 before it was closed, transferred about $150 from that into stars and grinded that up to about $1k before I decided I really needed to buy a Gibson!

Anyway, I started getting the itch again and ended up hitting a mtt freeroll for $3 and decided to see if I could grind it up from the 2nls.

Overall I'm happy with how things have gone - my main concern is my NSD$ being so negative. My 25nl has been choppy mostly when I was trying some things out to correct my NSD$. When I play my normal game without worrying about it, I do fine. At what stakes should the NSD$ be expected to turn around?

As far as the rest of the stats go, this is the first time I've ever taken them too seriously - I've been using PT for about the past month now to try it out and would appreciate any insights that can be learned from the data so far.

Thanks very much!


By mrkite08 at 2008-12-16


By mrkite08 at 2008-12-16


By mrkite08 at 2008-12-16
MrKite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 12:39 AM   #42
centurion
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 177
Am i just running bad?

Or do I play bad and get lucky? I'm not too sure anymore... =/

I play .10/.25 NL






Any legit criticism would be greatly appreciated.
irungood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 12:49 AM   #43
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,326
Re: Am i just running bad?

You realize you have a very solid winrate over that sample, right?

Last edited by Lego05; 12-18-2008 at 01:04 AM. Reason: added comma
Lego05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 01:07 AM   #44
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7,383
Re: Am i just running bad?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05 View Post
You realize you have a very solid winrate over that sample, right?
This, but it looks like you bluff too much and go to showdown with bad hands too often.
otatop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 01:10 AM   #45
old hand
 
deathduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,354
Re: Am i just running bad?

His showdown winnings aren't too bad considering this laggish style. It looks like most of the $ you make is from picking good spots to put pressure on opponents. Keep it up, your doing fine imo. If things go south for the next 10k hands then you need some considerations.
deathduck is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive