https://youtu.be/6GyH6sdOuKY
This is a random hand I stumbled upon but I was wondering if someone has insight into this. To me this seems like a pretty bad line, but maybe I'm missing something?
In my opinion, Daniel should be x/calling the flop instead of x/raising - especially on this board. It seems like a situation in which only worse folds and better calls. When he x/raises like this, he is folding his opponents bluffs most of the time. Only stronger kings, two pairs, sets, and over pairs are calling. I suppose some of the time middle pair can call like weaker Kx, A8, maybe Q8 with a backdoor flush (stretching it) and some smaller pocket pairs, but x/r for value from these hands is very very thin when Cannuli is likely to have more bluffs in his range. Why not just call and let him keep bluffing? And then on the turn he makes an even stranger decision and x/raises again? The flop x/r on a dry board seems pretty strong so shouldn't he be concerned when Cannuli calls flop and bets turn? What is Daniel trying to represent and what is he trying to get to call or fold? Is he trying to get a better king to fold now?
And I think Cannuli can just fold on the flop once he is raised, but I can see some reasons for calling. I would rather be floating with A5s/d/h though. On the turn I think the bet is ok if Daniel is x/r flop with hands like 67s, 34s, 9Ts, maybe QJs. Or he knows his pair is unlikely to be best at showdown. Otherwise just check?
Maybe Negreanu is on some next level thinking, but when I saw this I thought it was a pretty strange hand from both sides apart from the preflop raise and cbet. Maybe I'm missing something? Anyone have thoughts on my analysis?