Quote:
The tilt comes from bad beats, it's gross how many times I get it in good and still lose. Yea I know sample size, but a week of set over sets and other bs has caused me to tilt it off my biggest losing hands is AA couldn't play them without some joker flopping a set.
This is not the sign of a winning player.
Also there is inconsistency in this because you say you get the money in good and then "the joker flops a set every time". If you 4bet pre and he called half his stack then yes, that is just unlucky. If you raised (or god forbid limped) and shoveled in 20 times the pot on the flop then you absolutely butchered the hand.
Quote:
I beat 1/1 live cash games pretty easily I played everyday in the summer while I was in the UK for about 12BIs, but can't beat the online micros.
Live 1/1 is easier than micros online. Besides 12 buy ins when playing
every day for the summer is actually a poor result for a game that is supposed to be rather juicy.
Judging on the results, you're not a (significant) winning player online but more like breakeven. Now it might indeed by bad luck but especially when you're losing it is important not to blame bad results solely on variance but be extra motivated to study and review hands. What I see in the OP is basically "I'm crushing and getting unlucky by jokers flopping sets", not the mindset any winning player over large samples has. You don't get good that way.
Edit: it is much safer to blame big upswings on variance. That way you assume that you're not that good so you keep learning, if you're indeed not that good then you improve, if you are good anyways then you will become even better. If you assume you are losing because of variance while you are not, eventually you just keep losing.